Answer:
that is calm and respectful while still criticizing the writer's inability to understand a wider perspective.
Explanation:
n simple words, one has to remain calm and civilized in writing some formal agreement or any other such document. The writer has to keep in mind that the motive of the reply or the message is not to insult the other party but to make sure the understanding of the messages between the two parties must be established.
Thus, even if one feel dissatisfied or angry from someone while writing some formal critique he or she should not use aggressive language.
Answer:
no. because it's like saying that someone who is related to Ted Bundy should go to jail because they are related and because they are that they should go to jail to for the mutable murderings. when really they had nothing to do with it. my point is, is no because no everyone in a family is all good and imagines werent born here so why should they be a loud.
Answer: The country would start to fall, but then would attempt to make, grow, and produce all of their own goods.
Explanation:
If all of a sudden all of the trade in the world stopped there would be so many items lost due to this seeing as we rely on other stations around the world. If the trade just stopped the governement would have to rationalize the food, and oil usage until they could correctly make and drill all the products for themselves.
<span>The right answer is D. Have students discuss problems that arise in the classroom and develop possible ways of solving them. When
students establish their own rules, they are more likely to commit to
fulfilling them and see that their peers comply with them, unlike what
would happen if they perceive that they are forced to obey rules
established by others. <span>That is why the student should be encouraged to discuss possible options for a good coexistence in the classroom.
I hope this information can help you.
</span></span>
