1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mr Goodwill [35]
4 years ago
12

Why did the economy of texas struggle when it became a republic after indinpendence

History
1 answer:
Amiraneli [1.4K]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

In the early days of exploration and settlement by the Spanish, Texas represented a vast, unsecured, and sparsely populated territory with little immediate economic or political value. Over almost three centuries from approximately 1519 (when Spanish explorers first came to Texas) to 1800, the Spanish established only a few, relatively small settlements in the territory. Spain's military authority over that time was limited and uneven, sometimes eclipsed by aggressive and powerful indigenous groups like the Apaches and Comanches.

Vast spaces and sparse settlement made any claim to the territory tenuous. In 1803, only three years after the French wrested the territory of Louisiana from weak Spanish control, they sold it to the United States. The new owners then claimed that the territory's southwestern border was the Rio Grande (known to Mexicans as the Rio Bravo).

This raised Spanish concern that the territory west of the Sabine River needed to be populated with Spanish subjects--"facts on the ground," as we say today. The limited progress made by the Spanish in populating the Texas territory by the first decade of the 1800s easily came undone during the early struggles for independence from Mexico (1811 to 1813). By the time of Mexico's ultimate independence in 1821 the Texas territory had even fewer persons of Spanish descent than at the turn of the century--probably fewer than 5,000.

During the first two decades of the nineteenth century the people of the territory remained quite poor, even by frontier standards. The territory was too vast and under-populated for significant wealth generating commerce to thrive. The population and the economy was largely sustained by the Spanish military, which had sent garrisons to defend the territory from encroaching Anglos and hostile natives.

Stephen F. Austin

After independence a period of relative tranquility settled over Texas as the new Mexican government focused on establishing a constitution, laws and state-level administration. The territory of Texas was joined with Coahuila to become the state of Coahuila y Tejas.

Meanwhile, immigration from the United States--mainly from Tennessee--continued to swell the Anglo population. The settlement founded by Moses Austin in 1820 and later managed by his son Stephen grew steadily. Stephen sought and won approval for a law under the newly independent Mexican government that promoted the development of settlements by granting large tracts of land to agents who recruited colonists to the territory. This was known as the empresario system, and the agents were called empresarios.

Approximately 30 or more six-year empresario contacts were awarded beginning in 1825, providing compensation to the empresarios for up to 9,000 immigrant families. The empresario contracts covered vast areas of Texas territory, effectively denying the state government the authority over disposition of these lands for the six-year period of the contracts. These empresario contracts represented the main legal mechanism by which property in the public domain was put into private hands.

Still, because they provided land to settlers at very low cost, and required that the individual acquirers inhabit and cultivate the land, they had a broad democratizing effect. Concentration of land ownership and land speculation--common in other parts of the frontier in the United States--was largely absent in Coahuila y Tejas.

The late 1820s and 1830s were characterized by growing political tension despite--and perhaps because of--the deepening economic development in the territory. The population of Texas in 1820 was about 7,000, not much greater than it was in the first years of the century. But, during the colonization period after Mexican independence from Spain (1821-1835) the population of Texas grew at a considerable rate, if admittedly from a very low base. The non-native population grew more than ten-fold from about 2,000 at the time of Mexican independence to an estimated 20,000 in 1831.

Population growth through immigration primarily from the United States seemed to accelerate in the early 1830s despite the considerable political turmoil caused by factional struggles over political control of the huge expanse of territory that constituted the state of Coahuila y Tejas.

By 1834 the Texas population (including slaves) was estimated at 24,700. Just two years later in 1836--the year of Texas independence from Mexico--the non-native population was estimated at about 38,470. Including the estimated 14,200 natives brought the total population to well over 50,000.

Many factors on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border--then formed by the Sabine River which separates the states of Texas and Louisiana today--contributed to the considerable growth in the number of colonists from the United States. Still, it seems that the much lower cost of land in Texas than in frontier areas of the United States, combined with the formal land grant

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Por que Gandhi fue durante mente criticada durante su tiempo como primer ministro de la India?
Nady [450]
Because he was making a non-violent movement and was starving himself to death unless people cooperated with him which actually worked.
5 0
3 years ago
Which identifies the impact that Napoleon had on history? a. Napoleon established a parliamentary system of government that beca
AlladinOne [14]

Answer:

C is the correct option.

Explanation:

Napoleon Bonaparte was a french military leader, He conquered almost the whole of Europe in the Early Nineteenth Century. Conquest of Europe by him spread the ideas of the french revolution throughout Europe. The territories conquered by him had Versions of Napoleonic Code imposed on them which later formed the legal basis of European law today. The ideas of equality which was codified were also accepted by his opponents because they believed if they wanted to win they will have to create a strong state just like France.

6 0
3 years ago
Explain why the Germans were not happy with the War guilt clause of the Treaty of Versailles.
natima [27]
The Germans were also furious about the various terms of the Treaty. They hated clause 231 – the ‘War Guilt’ clause – which stated that Germany had caused ‘all the loss and damage’ of the war. Firstly, the Germans did not think that they had caused the war (for the Germans, the war was a war of self-defence against Russia, which had mobilised 31 July 1914). During the 1920s, the Germans published all their secret documents from 1914, to prove they had tried to stop the war. Secondly, the Germans hated clause 231 because accepting it gave the Allies the moral right to punish Germany – it validated all the harsh terms of the Treaty.


Hope this helps:)
8 0
3 years ago
What impact did the creation of a Jewish homeland have on palestinians living in the region?
shutvik [7]

Answer:

People made fun of them.

There were more Jewish people

Explanation:

Brainliest plz sis

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the novel, Nectar in a Sieve, water is symbolic of _____.
astraxan [27]

In the novel Nectar in a Sieve by Kamala Markandaya, water is a symbol that moves and ends all other symbols. Water through the rain affects the yields of the rice, also, it can come in the form of monsoon to come unexpectedly and also to go, and never can say with certainty when the rain will come and go on a daily basis. Water as a symbol fits perfectly into the type of Hindu religion, which has cyclicality, a circular flow between life and death. The water is present when Nathan dies, the rain that floods the flames on the temple, reminds that no force can resist inevitable death. Also, water is compared with a woman, if nature is dry, it is like a infertile  woman, if too immoral is used, then nature is too "mature", so water must be used moderately, or there are dangerous consequences. The relationship between woman and water is also given through the river, it gives life in a moderate form, because the fields are more fertile and have a high yield, but also take life in unhealthy spills and floods. So water can mean an ascent or a fall if it is not used moderately, too much or too little use is not good. Thus, water symbolizes fertility or infertility, life or death, just as the point of the Hindu religion is the circulation of life and death.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did president nicolae ceausescu respond to romania's fight for independence?
    11·2 answers
  • What method did the united states use in nicaragua, guatemala, and chile to prevent them from becoming communist states?
    10·2 answers
  • Why did president Theodore Roosevelt use the Roosevelt corollary in the Dominican Republic
    11·2 answers
  • Read the following passages. Each source is related to the 1858 debates between Stephen A. Douglas and Abraham Lincoln for a sea
    6·2 answers
  • Identify where each resource comes from.<br><br>please organize the chart in where they would be!
    6·2 answers
  • 24. Who was involved with cleopatra VII that was<br>defeated by Octavian?<br>Down​
    8·2 answers
  • PLZZZ HELPPPPP MEEEEEE ITS TIMEDDDDDDD -What were some of Justinian's achievements? How was Justinian similar to some of the Rom
    11·1 answer
  • All of the following groups of people could get land in Texas except
    7·2 answers
  • 4. What happened to John Merryman? '
    15·2 answers
  • What similarities and differences do
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!