Answer:
The correct answer choice for the question: Which of the following phrases best characterizes Herbert Hoover´s foreign policy agenda, would be: the last one: Mutual respect, in terms of being available to support others when called upon, but not interfering unnecessarily in their affairs.
Explanation:
Herbert Hoover served as the 31st president of the United States from 1929 to 1933, and he faced one of the toughest economical debacles in all of history. Although highly criticized later for the inefficient ways in which he was perceived to have acted to stop the domino effects of the Great Depression, there is one thing that can be said about him; he definitely believed in non-interventionism, whether on internal affairs, or foreign affairs. In foreign relations, Hoover was responsible for stepping down from intervening anymore in Latin American affairs, and also, as events that led to World War II, on events that took place in Asia. However, he was also always ready to act if needed; thus, he was not above threatening to intervene militarily in the Dominican Republic, and other such places. This is why the last option is the best one to describe this character´s international agenda.
"Numerous Indian citizens are hurt when an office building is attacked by the British" would most likely cause an increase in Indian nationalism.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
nationalism?</h3>
Generally, It is a political philosophy that stresses the importance of loyalty, devotion, or allegiance to a country or nation-state and maintains that such duties are more important than other individual or group interests.
In conclusion, Increased Indian nationalism would be probable if the British assaulted an office building and injured many Indian nationals.
Read more about Indian nationalism
brainly.com/question/15319440
#SPJ1
Explanation:
The rise in economic nationalism undermines the tradition of economic liberalism (globalism) and discourages economic and political cooperation between countries. ... Countries benefit with cooperation between countries to mutual benefit, becoming too nationalistic at the expense of its partners is counterproductive.
