Answer:
A secondary source summarizes large amounts of evidence.
Explanation:
Primary sources correspond to “primary literature” and are those that present themselves and are disseminated exactly as they are produced by their authors. Primary sources are original materials on which other research is based. This type of source presents the information in its original form, without interpretation, summarization or evaluation by other writers.
On the other hand, secondary sources are interpretations and evaluations of primary sources for this reason present a series of evidences that support their interpretations. In this sense, secondary sources may be more useful than a primary source.
Answer:
no idea sorry
Explanation:
luWQEkuywrwgwd3kyurtg3wkyrau3wrtak3vyrtgk3yrugx3ryutagv3kwy3trgv3wyrvgkw3aytyt3rktvw3afytv3cytvakryw3cv3tryvw3cryw3tvryckt3vyakv3r
c3wr
aw3rcw3raw3
rw3raw3raw3raw3raw3
craw3rcaw3r
3wraw3raw3r
wa3raw3raw
3raw3rcwrcwawrwr
I want to know the answer as well
<span>The Bill of Rights is one of the cornerstones of American freedoms, and it is in place to protect the rights of the citizens. The Bill of Rights was put in place in order to ensure that people are guaranteed a number of personal freedoms, and that the government does not become so powerful as to present a threat to the population.</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not specify what war you are talking about. Trying to help you we are going to assume that you are talking about World War I.
In addition to fighting in the army, European colonies contributed to the war effort in that these colonies sent supplies and food to the war front in Europe.
European superpowers had colonies in Africa, India, and Asia, places where there were plenty of natural resources and raw materials that were much needed by European countries during World War I. Great Britain and France were the European countries that used most soldiers from their colonies after many white troops were killed on the battlefield.
