Answer:
The French
Explanation:
I am sorry if I get it wrong but I am pretty sure that is the answer.
Answer:
Race
Explanation:
In sociology, the term race refers to a division sociologists made of people based on their physical inherited characteristics. In other words, the term race describes a group with similar physical characteristics that make them different from another group of people (like the color of their skin, the type or color of their hair, etc).
Therefore, we can say that race is the term that sociologists use to describe a socially defined group of people who are generally considered to be physically distinct in some way
The process of polymerase chain reaction is similar to the process of DNA replication, which occurs in cells. The statement that is presented is True. It is a technology in molecular biology. It used to amplify copies of piece of DNA across different orders of magnitude, etc.
The opinions that are being collected and are being published in volumes of books is known as reporters, which is letter A. It is because this is what the court judges made use of in writing their opinions in regards of their decision in a particular appeal or trial.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
