They both settle disputes between or on a land.
Differnce is that they dispute on different types of land
Before the act of emancipation was approved in July 1776, the Thirteen Colonies and the Kingdom of Great Britain had been at war for more than a year. Relations between the two had deteriorated since 1763. The British Parliament enacted a series of measures to increase taxes in the colonies, such as the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Act of 1767. The Legislative Body considered that these regulations were a legitimate means for the colonies to pay a fair share for the costs of keeping them in the British Empire.
However, many settlers had developed a different concept of the empire. The colonies were not directly represented in the Parliament and the settlers argued that this legislative body had no right to assign taxes. This fiscal dispute was part of a greater divergence between the British and American interpretations of the Constitution of Great Britain and the scope of Parliament's authority in the colonies. The orthodox view of the British - dating back to the Glorious Revolution of 1688 - argued that Parliament had supreme authority throughout the empire and, by extension, everything that Parliament did was constitutional. However, in the colonies the idea had developed that the British Constitution recognized certain fundamental rights that the government could not violate, not even Parliament. After the laws of Townshend, some essayists even began to question whether the Parliament had any legitimate jurisdiction in the colonies. Anticipating the creation of the Commonwealth of Nations, in 1774 the American literati - among them Samuel Adams, James Wilson and Thomas Jefferson - discussed whether the authority of Parliament was limited only to Great Britain and that the colonies -which had their own legislatures- they should relate to the rest of the empire solely because of their loyalty to the Crown.
<span>Carter’s failure to get the hostages back ruined his re-election chance in 1980.</span>
The correct answer for this question is "All of these choices are true about isolationists." The idea about isolationalists in the US includes:
(1) They believed the U.S. should remain uninvolved in world affairs
(2) They opposed the League <span>of Nations.
(3) They opposed Article X (Article 10) because it required League members to defend each other in case of attack.</span>
The supreme court ordered the end to school segregation, and declared it illegal and unconstitutional
in <span>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954), the supreme court issued a land mark ruling that held that </span>state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students to be unconstitutional. As a result the ruling <span>outlawed segregated public education facilities for blacks and whites at the state level, which came as a major victory for the civil rights movement.
</span>
