If you can separate the figures and the segment, or angle in question, is the same, the reflexive property of congruence can be used in the proof. ... Separating the two triangles, you can see Angle Z is the same angle for each triangle. Since they are the same angle, the angle is congruent to itself.
Hey there mate!
Please check the attached answer of picture for explanation.
1 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Y=(-1/6)x+5
m=(y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
m=(3-6)/(12-(-6))
m=(-3)/(18)
m=-1/6
y=mx+b
y=(-1/6)x+b
6=(-1/6)(-6)+b
6=1+b
b=5
y=(-1/6)x+5
Answer:
<h2>36b + 60c</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Put a = 6 to the expression 2a(3b + 5c):
(2)(6)(3b + 5c) = 12(3b + 5c) <em>use the distributive property</em>
= (12)(3b) + (12)(5c) = 36b + 60c
