1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Drupady [299]
3 years ago
8

what might a conversation between a roman child from the upper class and a roman child from a lower class look like.the text mes

sage conversation must: have a total of 10 text messages each at least two complete sentences. describe the differences in the daily lives of upper class and lower class citizens. describe the opportunities for children in general in Rome. compare how life differed from female and male children in Rome. explain the effect of social status on one's future in the Roman Republic.​
History
1 answer:
Solnce55 [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Patrician vs Plebeian

Explanation:

A conversation between a Patrician's child (member of the upper class) and a Plebeian´s child (member of the lower class) probably would have been, if any, a monologue in a commanding way. Tradition had it that the Patricians and the Plebeians should be strictly separated.

It goes without saying that the children of Patricians had a better life than the Plebeian ones.

Although men & women were called citizens, they differed on an important issue: women didn´t have the right to vote, which ment a lot in a Republic where political activities were the backbone of the society. We can even consider this as proof that women were only citizens in name.

So if you were a boy and Patrician your future looked good; if you were a girl and Plebeian it did not.

You might be interested in
Before finally making the decision to enter the war, President Wilson tried to keep the United States neutral. He even tried to
Salsk061 [2.6K]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The suggestions that I think he might have made to the two sides if he had gotten them together to discuss a peace treaty would have been the following.

First, I would have recommended US President Woodrow Wilson to tell both sides of the conflict to meet at a neutral site; in this case, I would have invited them to New York City.

Then, President Wilson would open a series of meetings and negotiations letting the European countries know the kind of suffering, pain, and damage the war would produce to each and every country involved. President Wilson could show a forecast of the possible consequences.

Finally, showing the moral authority of the US at that time, he could have invited both sides to leave their expansionist interests and leave the occupied territories and stop the threats of invasion. This could have been a good-will sign to move on with diplomatic agreements.

8 0
3 years ago
What role did the Catholic Church play in governing Spain’s American empire?
spayn [35]
Well, the answer that you are looking for is going to be that t<span>he Spanish had been a very Catholic Empire. They brought missionaries, sisters, brothers, and priests to convert the natives to a religion called Christianity.







I hope this helps!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please mark me as Brainiest</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ano ang cohesive device?​
AveGali [126]
Ang Cohesive devices o, Kohesyong gramatikal ay mga salitang panghalili sa pangngalan sa isang pangungusap. Mayroong dalawang uri ng Kohesyong Gramatikal, ito ay ang mga sumusunod:

Anapora - panghalili sa pangngalan na matatagpuan sa hulihan ng pangungusap.

Katapora - panghalili sa pangngalan na matatagpuan sa unahan ng pangungusap.
_
Tatlong halimbawa ng Cohesive devices:

1) Ito
2) Dito
3) Siya
5 0
3 years ago
How were cities in the north changing during the 1800s
Dafna11 [192]

Answer:

I'm not sure eexactly wat you are looking for here but in the 1800 many cities were being made up of immigrants, fleeing to America for a better life. They changed the demographic of these Northern Cities, and played a great part in making America what it is today.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What did people in the south that didn't own slaves think about slavery?
Lelu [443]
That could go both ways, maybe they didnt own a plantation or have use for a slave. But they still could support it. Or, they could be completely against it, and think its completely wrong and dehumanizing, they could help runaway slaves get to the north.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 22. One of the many nonviolent acts of Mohandas Gandhi was
    12·1 answer
  • Choose all of the topics dealt with by amendments considered to be part of the "Reconstruction Amendments." Stopping the spread
    9·1 answer
  • What year did columbis sail the seas
    5·2 answers
  • A difference between the Florida constitution and the US Bill of Rights is that the Florida constitution mentions
    8·2 answers
  • Help! i need to know this:
    10·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    15·1 answer
  • What best describes Beowulf's “call to adventure?”
    14·1 answer
  • Arrange the events of Juan Garrido's life in chronological order.
    8·1 answer
  • Reasos for the killing of the Uganda martrys​
    9·2 answers
  • How do you think the Lewis and Clark expedition might have been different if Sacajawea had joined the group
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!