Cardiogenic shock following ami is caused by:
- Decreased pumping force of the heart muscle.
<h3>What is Cardiogenic Shock?</h3>
Cardiogenic shock is an aftermath of Acute Myocardial Infarction. It arises because of the body's sudden inability to pump a sufficient amount of blood to the vital organs of the body.
The mortality rate due to cardiogenic shock is above average.
Learn more about cardiogenic shock here:
brainly.com/question/23788456
#SPJ12
Answer:
present value $ 1,026.16
future value $ 1,539.98
Explanation:
Present Value = $ 100 * 1/(1.07) ^ 1 + $ 100 * 1/(1.07) ^ 2 +$ 100 * 1/(1.07) ^3 + $ 200 * 1/(1.07) ^4 + $ 300 * 1/(1.07) ^5 +$ 600 * 1/(1.07) ^6
=93.45+ 87.34+81.62+152.20+213.23+398.32
= $ 1,026.16
therefore, the correct value is $ 1,026.16
b. Future Value = Present Value * ( 1+ Rate of Interest ) ^ Time
= $ 1,175.63 * ( 1+0.07) ^ 6
= $ 1,539.98
Hence the correct answer is $ 1,539.98
Answer:
The 50.30 days are required to take its credit customers to pay for their purchases.
Explanation:
For computing the average collection period, we have to use the formula of the average collection period.
Average collection period = Average accounts receivable ÷ Credit sales × total number of days in a year
= $107,900 ÷ $783,000 × 365
= 0.13780 × 365
= 50.30 days
We assume 365 days in a year
The cost of goods sold is irrelevant. Thus, it is not considered in the computation part.
Hence, 50.30 days are required to take its credit customers to pay for their purchases.
Answer:
$122,500
Explanation:
Calculation for the amount of the common fixed expense not traceable to the individual divisions
First step is to calculate Total segment margin
Total segment margin = $43,600 + $174,300
Total segment margin= $217,900
Now let calculate the Common fixed expense
Common fixed expense = $217,900-$95,400
Common fixed expense $122,500
Therefore the amount of the common fixed expense not traceable to the individual divisions is $122,500
When we're trying to determine a genetic foundation for intelligence and criminality we're allowing for the possibility of genetic determinism being a true thing which we obviously know it's not. For that reason it might be problematic to conclude anything about a genetic diagnosis for either of those considering there are always multiple variables which are at play.