Answer:
(C) debit to Foreign-Currency Transaction Loss-$1040
Explanation:
Foreign currency related Financial assets and financial liabilities are usually revalued with any difference as a result of the exchange rates posted as a gain or loss in the income statement.
On transaction date, cost of assets
= 520000 * $0.034
On payment date, the amount paid
= 520000 * $0.036
The amount paid is higher than the liability recorded before hence the difference is recognized as a loss on foreign exchange.
= 520000 * $0.036 - 520000 * $0.034
= $1040
Answer:
This implies that bus is an inferior good and car is a normal good.
Explanation:
Initially, Jim's income was $5000 a year.
As his income increases to $60,000 a year, he decides to buy a car instead of using the bus.
In other words, with the increase in income, the demand for traveling by bus is declining.
This implies that it is an inferior good.
The demand for the car is increasing with an increase in income.
So, the car is a normal good.
An inferior good can be defined as a product that shows negative elasticity. This means with an increase in income its demand declines an vice versa.
A normal good can be defined as a product that shows positive income elasticity. That is, its demand increases with rise in income and vice versa.
Answer:
a. $15,500
Explanation:
Based on LIFO, cost of 1500 unit sold will be entirely from the Purchases (year X1). Therefore, we have:
Value of units purchases (year X1) outstanding after sales = (2,000 - 1,500) * $11 = 500 * $11 = $5,500
Therefore, we have
LIFO Inventory on 12/31/X1 = Value of beginning Inventory (1/1/X1) + $5,500 = $10,000 + $5,500 = $15,500.
impossible
Explanation:
because the girls are over populated
Answer:
The correct answer is C
Explanation:
NCI stands for the Non-controlling interest which also called as the minority interest, it is defined as the position of ownership where the shareholder owns outstanding shares that is less than 50% and has no control on the decisions.
Under the situation where the active prices for the shares are not acquired by the acquirer states a different value, it is not appropriate to assume the value of the non-controlling shares same as of the controlling shares.
