Of the opening sentences that were presented here that strongly engages the reader and provides context to them would be the second one which is "We could have had a worse weekend, but it's awfully hard to beat Bigfoot and bugs."
The first and third one were just not good enough because it exposes the rest of the context to the reader and lets them have the idea of what you are talking about which usually leads to the readers not choosing to continue to read, thus taking out the reader's engagement but still provides context. The last one is better than the first and third, but it spilled the beans when it mentioned the particulars as to what made the weekend bad to worse. The answer is just right. It has the impact that would hook the reader to know more about your weekend and why is Bigfoot and bugs together in your statement. The rain wasn't mentioned which would be ideal to make the story telling take a turn to much worse which would spike up the interest of the reader.
Answer:
a stronger connection with other people who share his trials
Explanation:
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Kalani and lael are students who have been comparing the total kinetic energy of an iceberg to an ice cube
Kalani’s Argument: My claim is that an iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube. This is because even though an iceberg is about the same temperature as an ice cube, it is also much larger, so it is made of a lot more molecules. For this reason, an iceberg will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube.
Lael's Argument: An iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube because it is larger and made of more molecules. This matters because molecules move, and moving things have kinetic energy, so each molecule adds its kinetic energy to the total. Since the iceberg and the ice cube are around the same temperature, the fact that the iceberg has extra molecules means that it will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy).
Which argument is more convincing?
Answer:
Kalani's argument is more convincing.
Explanation:
Lael says that the fact that Icebrg has extra molecules means that it has greater kinetic energy and this is not true, since the kinetic energy is greater in bodies and objects that have greater speed. In addition, speed increases as a body has greater mass. In this case, we can consider Kalani's argument as more convincing, since she related the kinetic energy to the mass of the iceberg.
1. Physical Issue with high use of digital technology - <em>Text Neck Syndrome</em>
Text Neck Syndrome or Anterior Neck Syndrome refers to strain in the neck and shoulders that is caused by flexing the neck forwards and downwards while using a smartphone. Increased usage of smartphones has increased the risk of text neck syndrome.
Solution: To reduce the risk of Text Neck Syndrome:
a) smartphone usage should be minimized
b) Hold your phone at eye level while using it
c) Perform gentle neck stretches.
2. Psychological Issue with high use of digital technology- <em>Low self-esteem</em>
Individuals of all ages, and especially adolescents, might experience low self-esteem, feelings of inadequacy and poor body-image due to high use of digital technology. This is because digital technology over-represents models or celebrities who are underweight. Additionally, platforms like [email protected] and [email protected] predominately display the glamorous side of life (parties, vacations, etc.) that are not an accurate reflection of reality.
Solution: The best solution for the aforementioned scenario would be to follow content that is positive, encouraging and motivational, such as well-being podcasts, [email protected] groups, [email protected] accounts, etc. Additionally, limiting usage of digital technology would also be helpful.
Answer:
the author characterize the juror
