It was the Northerns I believe, it pushed he north and south and it began a civil war. Hoped I helped. :)
The answer really depends on whether the farmer is also the landlord or only a worker in the fields, and bearing in mind that the question refers only to Chavez’ reforms, not what is now called Chavismo, that is to say, the rule of President Maduro.
If the first, then there are chances that the landlord would feel threatened about the fact this his land could be —although not necessarily— appropriated by the State, but also, he might feel relieved to learn that his land could be more productive since there would be a lot more subsidies for farming since the oil revenues of the country would again be in the hands of the State.
If it is the second possibility, the farmer most likely would feel relieved altogether since subsidies to labor power and farming would mean greater income and better living conditions for him and his family.
Answer:
Explanation:
One point is earned for making an accurate comparison of both Federalist and Anti-federalist positions. The Federalists wanted a stronger national government and weaker state governments, while the Anti-federalists wanted a weaker national government and stronger state government.
Answer:
I think its C but im not totally positive.
The U.S. government introduced rationing mostly in order to <span>make sure war industries had the resources they needed</span>. The answer to your question is A. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has helped you.
