The globalization of indifference makes us anonymous, responsible without a name and without face. Those who are interested only in themselves waste the happiness that comes from serving. Another Francis, the saint of Assisi, who serves to serve more happiness than to be served. Just try it. There are many women and many men who volunteer and try to improve the world. There are professionals who do their kind of building bridges, so that in the engineering of life, be it saved back. Every time we see the other, we reduce indifference and help to globalize respect and fraternity.
Answer:
What types of drinks did Mary make for her husband and her? It is a right there question.
Explanation:
A right there question has the answer clearly stated in the text. When we reread the text, we can specifically find the phrase or sentence that has the answer.
The question -what type of drinks did Mary make for her husband and her?- has the answer in the second paragraph where it says "...She walked over and made the drinks, <u>a strongish one for him, a weak one for herself.</u>.."
Answer:
If you can make a prediction based on what you see now, we use going to. For example, “You're driving too fast, you're going to hit the car in front!”
Both explain what the caption fears will happen which is gonna be answer D stranded
Answer:
Explanation:
On March 4th, when Charlie took the Rorschach Test, he was supposed to view the images of the inkblots and freely imagine what he saw in them. But Charlie only saw the inkblots for what they were: blobs of ink. Even when Burt tells him to imagine, to pretend, to look for something there in the card, Charlie can't. He struggles to give a true description of the cards, pointing out how one was "a very nice pictur of ink with pritty points all around the eges," but again, this isn't the response that the psychologist is looking for.
Like ambiguously shaped clouds in which people "see" images of people and animals, the inkblots have enough random, busy shapes on them for people to interpret them as many different things--people, animals, scenes, conflicts, and so on. The idea is that the psychologist will pay attention to what a person thinks he or she sees in the inkblots, which is supposed to provide insight on what that person thinks and feels overall.
As a result of Charlie's inability to properly take this test, he worries that he's failed and that he won't be a candidate for the treatment to increase his intelligence. And while he gets frustrated with himself during the test, and while Burt seems to get almost angry--as evinced when his pencil point breaks--I wouldn't say that Charlie is angry in this situation.
But what this scene does reveal about his character is that perhaps he's already smarter than we expect. By insisting on seeing the inkblots for what they really are, and by failing to imagine scenes and images that are false or skewed, Charlie shows that he's not just honest but scrupulous. This early evidence of his good character foreshadows the upcoming conflicts he has with the men at the bakery as well as the researchers themselves, who are less scrupulous.
