Answer:
In Griffin v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination not only allows a criminal defendant to refuse to take the witness stand during his trial, but it also bars the prosecutor from urging the jury to interpret that silence as an indication that the defendant has something to hide. The Court reasons that the right against self-incrimination would be meaningless if a defendant’s exercise of the right could be used against him.
Hope this helps
This is a biology question
Answer: Rule; Issue; Analysis
Explanation:
Legal reasoning refers to a method of thought whereby legal rules are applied to specific interactions.
When the facts are compared to the rule, an analysis of the case can be developed. From this analysis, a (rule) can be made as to whether or not the (issue) applies to the (analysis).
D makes more sense so try D
You’re gonna have to provide some context.
