1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
notka56 [123]
3 years ago
12

Will mark brainliest!!

Law
1 answer:
Finger [1]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

I belive its B.

because it doesn't mention that in the Bill of rights...I believe:/

You might be interested in
A police officer must fall through and decisions without
MAXImum [283]
Assistance but also hesitation at the same time
6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following actions is illegal?
Darya [45]
C it is illegal for a minor to attempt purchasing an alcoholic beverage
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How community and public policies are organized and enacted?
lubasha [3.4K]

Answer:

Communities operate in the context of federal and state policies that can affect local government decisions relevant to health through laws and regulations, through the allocation of resources, and by shaping political will on issues and approaches. Among the more widely recognized policies are those that fund or regulate health care delivery services. But policies in a variety of areas, ranging from education to land use and housing, the environment, and criminal justice, can be relevant to health disparities. Policies can vary significantly across geographic areas and over time in establishing priorities, providing funding, or encouraging collaboration. They can provide important opportunities or constitute barriers to promoting health equity. The policy context shapes the levers that are available to communities to address change.

It seems reasonable to assume that the better informed communities are about the implications of federal and state policy and policy changes, the greater their ability will be to respond effectively to address health disparities and help achieve change in the determinants of health. And, conversely, the more the needs of communities are considered in decision making at the federal and state levels, the more effective those policies will be. In other words, policy makers have the opportunity to lay the groundwork for community success. This policy context (i.e., socioeconomic and political drivers) is highlighted in the report’s conceptual model in Figure

5 0
3 years ago
Steps taken for arrest warrant
Effectus [21]

Answer:

Steps in a Trial

Arrest Procedures

When an officer arrests someone, the accused is taken into custody. Similarly, when a grand jury returns an indictment or a prosecutor files an information, a judge or magistrate issues a warrant for the arrest of the person charged if not already under arrest, and the person is taken into custody. (Sometimes, for less serious offenses, defendants are issued citations to appear rather than being arrested.)

When people are taken into custody, before they are questioned, they must be informed that anything they say may be held against them in a court of law, and that they have the right to remain silent,

consult with a lawyer before and during questioning, and

have a lawyer appointed to represent them if they cannot afford one.

They are also told that they can exercise these rights at any time. In some states, there may be variation in this statement for juveniles. For example, juveniles might be warned that if the juvenile court waives jurisdiction over them, then the statements they make can be used against them in a court proceeding in which they will be tried as an adult.

These are often referred to as the Miranda rights because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1966 in Miranda v. Arizona that when law enforcement officers question people taken into custody, the evidence garnered from their interview cannot be used against them unless they have been informed of their constitutional rights to counsel and to remain silent.

If a person has been arrested without a warrant, law enforcement officials may hold him or her for a period of time necessary to handle certain administrative tasks (fingerprinting, checking to see if the person is the subject of any outstanding warrants, etc.) This time may vary depending on the facts of the particular case, but it’s generally quite brief, usually no more than 48 hours. They may not hold the person beyond that time without an initial or first appearance or arraignment before a judge or magistrate (a public official vested with certain judicial powers in the federal system and the systems of some states).

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Is Reginald right? Did he learn his problem behavior from his
Vladimir79 [104]

Answer:

Heyyy like the pic

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Amy breached her contract with Allen. The court will award Allen compensatory damages in an amount sufficient to: Group of answe
    12·1 answer
  • What is human trafficking ​
    6·2 answers
  • What is the importance of different types of plans in police operation?​
    14·1 answer
  • Why is military justice entirely separate from civilian courts? What is your opinion on this separation, is it necessary?
    13·1 answer
  • What is katarungang Pambarangay​
    14·2 answers
  • The life cycle of the
    8·1 answer
  • What is the income threshold for self-employed workers to file a return?
    13·1 answer
  • Power comes from being trusted or respected​
    12·2 answers
  • Someone you know gets a perfect score on the SAT. What personal, family, and social characteristics do you think they have
    12·1 answer
  • Contracts drafted under a civil law system tend to be _____ compared to those drafted under a common law system.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!