Answer:
d.Social conventional reasoning
Explanation:
Social conventional reasoning: In psychology, the term "social conventional reasoning" is described as a phenomenon that generally aims at different arbitrary rules that are being established via "consensus" to keep the social order and system, for example, an individual raises his or her hand to talk, moral reasoning (aims at morality rules and ethical issues), for example, justice and prosocial behavior.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the "social conventional reasoning".
It mostly about the citizenship of mexican people where the land is acquired.
At that time, united states wanted Mexican citizens in the acquired land to became a part of American citizens and counted as their workforce. Mexican government believe that they are still Mexican citizens regardless of the ownership of the land. This political conflict lead to the U.S. Mexican war
Thomas Jefferson inferred from the Necessary and Proper Clause that the Supreme Court would serve to expand federal power pass what was limited by the constitution.
He thought they would be able to do this because the Supreme Court was not accountable to check or balance from the States.
<span>The law of soil (also known as "Jus Soli") is when an offspring is born in the U.S., they are granted citizenship.
The law of blood (also known as "Jus Sanguinis") is when an offspring of an American citizen, you are a natural born U.S. citizen.</span>
Since there are only two technicians, they can only take so
much work. The production possibility curve will go up initially but will
flatten as the technicians reach their limit.
<span> </span>
