1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anastassius [24]
3 years ago
8

What was an immediate outcome of the fall of the Soviet Union

History
2 answers:
Alexeev081 [22]3 years ago
3 0

The Soviet Union became a democratic state.

Ivahew [28]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The immediate outcome of the fall of the Soviet Union was the increase of the United States influence as a major global power.

During the Cold War, the US and the Soviet Union were on different economic spectrums. While the US defended capitalism, free economy and democracy, the Soviet Union defended Communism and a strongly influenced economy.

It also led to the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989 which was a major symbol of the ruin of the Soviet Union.

You might be interested in
1. What advantages did the North have in the Civil War?
muminat

Answer:

The North had geographic advantages, too. It had more farms than the South to provide food for troops. Its land contained most of the country's iron, coal, copper, and gold. The North controlled the seas, and its 21,000 miles of railroad track allowed troops and supplies to be transported wherever they were needed.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the incorporation fo the bill of rights apex?
AveGali [126]

The incorporation of the bill of rights is a doctrine that defends that The Bill of Rights should be applicable and respected by the states of the US.

Initially, the Supreme Court was strict on this matter and the common understanding was that the Bill of Rights should only be respected and followed by the Federal Government - you can see it on Barron vs Baltimore case. After the abolition of slavery and the post-civil war era many rights were granted to people and over time the incorporation doctrine gained strength.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the best way to check the reliability and validity of a resource?
Vaselesa [24]
You can check other sources  as well
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the fundamentalist revolt take place
sergey [27]

Answer: What was the fundamentalist revolt?

The protestants felt threatened by the decline of value and increase in visibility of Catholicism and Judaism. The Fundamentalists ended up launching a campaign to rid Protestant denominations of modernism and to combat the new individual freedoms that seemed to contradict traditional morals.

What caused fundamentalism?

The causes of Fundamentalism. Steve Bruce argues that the main causes of Fundamentalism are modernisation and secularisation, but we also need to consider the nature of the religions themselves and a range of 'external factors' to fully explain the growth of fundamentalist movements.

Fundamentalism, in the narrowest meaning of the term, was a movement that began in the late 19th- and early 20th-century within American Protestant circles to defend the "fundamentals of belief" against the corrosive effects of liberalism that had grown within the ranks of Protestantism itself. Liberalism, manifested in critical approaches to the Bible that relied on purely natural assumptions, or that framed Christianity as a purely natural or human phenomenon that could be explained scientifically, presented a challenge to traditional belief.

A multi-volume group of essays edited by Reuben Torrey, and published in 1910 under the title, The Fundamentals, was financed and distributed by Presbyterian laymen Lyman and Milton Stewart and was an attempt to arrest the drift of Protestant belief. Its influence was large and was the source of the labeling of conservatives as "fundamentalists."

Useful for looking at this history of fundamentalism are George Marsden's Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870-1925 (New York: Oxford, 1980), Bruce B. Lawrence, Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt against the Modern Age (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989), David Beale, In Pursuit of Purity: American Fundamentalism Since 1850 (Greenville: Unusual Publications, 1986), and Mark A. Noll, A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992).

Lately, the meaning of the word "fundamentalism" has expanded. This has happened in the press, in academia, and in ordinary language. It appears to be expanding to include any unquestioned adherence to fundamental principles or beliefs, and is often used in a pejorative sense. Nowadays we hear about not only Protestant evangelical fundamentalists, but Catholic fundamentalists, Mormon fundamentalists, Islamic fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, Buddhist fundamentalists, and even atheist or secular or Darwinian fundamentalists.

Scholars of religion have perhaps indirectly contributed to this expansion of the term, as they have tried to look for similarities in ways of being religious that are common in various systems of belief. Between 1991 and 1995, religion scholars Martin Marty and Scott Appleby published a 5-volume collection of essays as part of "The Fundamentalism Project" at the University of Chicago, which is an example of this approach. Appleby is co-author of Strong Religion (2003), also from the University of Chicago Press that attempts to give a common explanatory framework for understanding anti-modern and anti-secular religious movements around the world.

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement about representation in the media is true?
KengaRu [80]

Answer:

C seems the most logical

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • President wilson "peace without victory" idea formed a key part of what?
    9·2 answers
  • Why were the events at dunkirk memorable in military history?
    12·1 answer
  • I need help on number 3
    10·1 answer
  • Federalists hesitated to support the new French Republic because they believed the French Revolutioniaries
    15·1 answer
  • What did the Kansas-Nebraska Act formalize?
    13·1 answer
  • Dividing the power between the legislative, executive, and judicial functions of government is the definition of which of the fo
    5·1 answer
  • What happened as southern democrats gained power?
    15·2 answers
  • If I was born 2006 am i 13
    8·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP! <br> How a bill becomes a law? WILL GIVE ALL MY POINTS
    10·1 answer
  • The Middle Passage is the pattern of trade between Europe, West Africa, and the Americas. A. True B. False
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!