Answer:
Not very well especially considering that many Warsaw Pact citizens actually took part in war against Soviet Union
Explanation:
The Warsaw Pact, so named because the treaty was signed in Warsaw, included the Soviet Union, Albania, Poland, Romania, Hungary, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, and Bulgaria as members. ... The Soviets obviously saw this as a direct threat and responded with the Warsaw Pact. The Warsaw Pact remained intact until 1991.
(Only Albania and Romania refused to join in the Czechoslovak repression.) After the democratic revolutions of 1989 in eastern Europe, the Warsaw Pact became moribund and was formally declared “nonexistent” on July 1, 1991, at a final summit meeting of Warsaw Pact leaders in Prague, Czechoslovakia
Answer: it is the first one
An addition or change to the constitution is known as an amendment. They have to go through many stages of deliberation before becoming part of the constitution.
Hope this helps and have a nice day! :)
Answer:
Explanation:
Kerensky’s intuitive knowledge of the appropriate action to take in the early days of the Revolution was unmatched by the other leading political figures of the time. In March 1917, when former Tsarist ministers were seized in the street and roughly escorted to the Winter Palace, Kerensky stepped forward and declared them ‘prisoners of the revolution’. He also issued the arrest of Minster of War Vladimir Sukhomlinov – for so long, a symbol of power and corruption in the old regime – something his colleagues lacked the courage to do. Kerensky could see that only by legitimising their capture with arrest could protect them from the angry mobs in Petrograd.
The ability to deliver speeches that would connect with audiences was an important skill for any public figure in 1917. Kerensky’s experience as an advocate served him well in this respect. Although his speeches were rather cliché ridden, they were very successful, making direct appeals to ‘his people’ and tears would sometimes be seen running down his face as he spoke.
But soon his tone changed, especially after the attempted Bolshevik rising of July, becoming increasingly authoritarian. Where once he had appealed directly to the goodness of the people, now he called for the preservation of the State.
Despite this, it is difficult to find strong evidence for his well-reported egotism. Kerensky was the only moderate prepared to take on the responsibility of heading Russia, and faced criticism from across the political spectrum when he was unable to avert the Bolshevik seizure of power and subsequent descent into civil war.
The current industrial process is similar to the processes of the Industrial Revolution in the use of machines for production.
The differences are related to current technological advances, such as the increase in machine automation and industrial communication.
<h3 /><h3>What was the Industrial Revolution?</h3>
It was a change that first occurred in Europe and spread throughout the world, generating changes in the manufacture of goods, with the substitution of an agrarian economy for a manufacturing one, with the use of machines and new means of transport.
Therefore, the Industrial Revolution was a factor that consolidated capitalism, by increasing production and the efficiency of companies.
Find out more about Industrial Revolution here:
brainly.com/question/13323062
#SPJ1
