All categories

3 years ago

The powhatan indians of the early 17th century could best be described as

History

1 answer:

blsea [12.9K]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The Powhatan Indians of early 17th century could best be described as having a tense and confrontational relationship with British settlers.

Explanation:

The Powhatan, who lived on the east coast of North America at the time of the first settlers, were in fact not an independent people, but a confederation consisting of a number of smaller Indian peoples who together formed a strong union. They were part of the Algonkin language family. Until about 1400 the nations had lived in a loose partnership, but in the years that followed a number of leaders fought for a closer union between their peoples and thus formed one of the few North American empires that resembled Mexican civilizations. For a long time the federation consisted of the Powhatans, the Arrohatecks, the Appamattucks, the Pamunkeys, the Mattaponis, and the Chiskiacks; in 1598, the Kecoughtans also joined under pressure from chief Powhatan, who was named after the most dominant tribe in the area.

However, with the arrival of the English colonists in Jamestown in 1607, the invasion of the new arrivals and their constant increase in numbers on what had been Indian land, resulted in conflicts that became almost continuous for 37 years.

You might be interested in

ASAP!!!

Firlakuza [10]

It’s either B or D but in mostly think B

6 0

3 years ago

Veena writes an essay about Native Americans in the 1800s: Native Americans and U.S. settlers struggled for land during the earl

Marina86 [1]

The Seminole War was fought over control of Florida.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLZ HELP!! To renounce one’s liberty is to renounce one’s quality as a man, the rights and also the duties of humanity. For him

iren [92.7K]

Answer:

In this passage, Rousseau expresses his belief that when individuals renounce their liberty, they become enslaved by the government. He maintains that such a renunciation is incompatible with human nature, and that absolute government is vain and contradictory.

This is the correct answer

7 0

4 years ago

Now look at the following images. All three were made by artists at different times in history to depict how people might live i

SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

The chosen image was number 1.

Explanation:

"The City of Salzburg in the Year 2000" is a very peculiar painting that shows humanity's ambition to develop scientific advances that can improve everyone's life.

The painting was created in 1900 representing a future in which people fly using giant wings. At that time, the plane had not yet been invented, but man's desire to cross the skies while traveling was already present in society. The most interesting thing about this image is the artist's certainty in showing how we would be able to fly, even if it took a thousand years to happen. The image reaffirms the human being's intelligence and his capacity to innovate and build.

The artist does not imagine in 3 years later, in 1903 there were already people creating the first prototype aircraft and doing research to make them possible. Which means that the advance we dream of is often closer than we can imagine.

3 0

4 years ago

The Articles were written to govern a new country, the ______________________________________________. But the Articles were too

Talja [164]

Answer:

The Articles were written to govern a new country, the United

States of America. But the Articles were too weak to do that

effectively.

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation were written during the American Revolution. Ben Franklin wrote the first draft. It did not pass because the colonists thought it gave too much power to a central government. After a great deal of discussion and correction, the articles were rewritten and ratified in 1781. The ratified Articles stated that each state had one vote in a newly formed Congress.

<em>According to the Articles, Congress COULD:</em>

Conduct foreign affairs

Make treaties

Declare war

Maintain an army and a navy

Coin money

Establish post offices

<em>According to the Articles, Congress COULD NOT:</em>

Could not elect a president of the central government.

Could not enforce laws. Congress could pass laws, but Congress could not force the states to obey those laws.

Could not raise money by collecting taxes, not from the people, and not from the states. Without taxation, it was nearly impossible to run a government.

It was soon obvious that the Articles were too weak to create a functioning central government. In 1787, the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia. Two of its strongest supporters were Ben Franklin and George Washington. In 1779, a new document went into effect. They called it the Constitution.

7 0

2 years ago