Different tools for different jobs used differently by different people.
Remember, from a population base of about the same size (two million) the Mongols deployed far more archers much farther from home. There were twice as many Mongol archers (30,000) at Mohi alone (thousands of miles from home) than there were English archers at Crecy, Poitiers, and Agincourt (right next door) combined (15,000).
The English would not have done any better, nor worse, with the Mongol recurve bow. The Mongols would have done worse with the longbow. That’s due to how they fought with them, not how good or bad the bows were.
Draw weights were comparable. English longbows ranged from 80–120lbs at the beginning of the Hundred Years War (which the English lost BTW) to 100–140lbs by the end. By the 16th century most of the bows found on the the ship Mary Rose were in the 140–160lbs range, with the heaviest at about 185lbs.
Answer:
Because ....
Explanation:
In museums there is usually information about certain object. And about other information?
Usually there is a group of people who check the information, compare it to other similar ones and then "publish" it (hope I used the correct word)
That's the reason why information in museums is usually quite correct
Though hope someone else answers your question too
Like the question you asked about, it's always better to have other sources of information to compare with
No, king James fleed so king William of orange and his wife ruled England together
Brunelleschi created perspective, it was important because it was never seen before and allowed artists to draw what their eyes could see
Answer:
I'd be very scared and nervous if I lived under the constant threat of a nuclear attack because I would be afraid of getting severely injured or hurt. I would also be worried for my friends and family because I want them to be safe too.
