In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
Answer:
1
Explanation:
the internet!
just kidding I learned this
Answer:
fire.
Explanation:
According to the officals, fire can easily occur in sports related things
One way the Maori culture most differs from the Haida culture is that the Maori culture "cares for the earth".
<u>Option:</u> A
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Maori People are New Zealand's first citizens. In the 1970s, political activism led a revival in Maori culture and integrity. One of several Maori policy initiatives that had been implemented was the institutionalization of environmental protection.
One distinction between both, the creation myths of Maori and Haida is that the Maori claim the stars were generated to make the sky more magnificent, and the Haida sees the stars as a light source.The legend of the Maori formation tells a tale how human beings were conceived, and how nature contributed by sacrificing itself in their conception.
