1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vanyuwa [196]
3 years ago
9

In at least two well-written paragraphs, explain the significance of one of the cases below and describe how the case relates to

federalism.
McCulloch v. Maryland, Gibbons v. Ogden, or District of Columbia v. Heller
History
2 answers:
AleksandrR [38]3 years ago
8 0

<em><u>In the District of Columbia versus  Heller, the Supreme Court ruled that Columbia’s District court “gun control la”w was unconstitutional. The  ruling was an act of Federalism as unconstitutional  law enacted by one court was stated null by the higher court that shows the benefit of having a Federal administration.  </u></em>

Further Explanations:

Heller versus District of Columbia was a momentous case that held the “Second Amendment” that was defending individuals from having guns despite being associated with any military services. The ruling granted individuals retaining arms for self-defense and lawful purpose.  It also indicated that the right to endure arms was not limitless and its possession will be synchronized. It was the first occurrence when the “Supreme Court” was to decide whether the “Second Amendment” is shielding the rights or not.

The case got devised in the suit trailed in the “District law court” of the nation in 2003 in the case “Parker versus District of Columbia” filed against the “Firearms Control Regulation act “of 1975. The act prohibited the handling of unauthorized guns and deadly weapons. The Supreme Court overheard its oral argument on 18th March 2008 and gave the ruling two months later on 26 July endorsing the individual rights.  

Learn more :

  1. What did china agree to do once the treaty of Nanjing was signed? check all that apply? <u>brainly.com/question/175568</u>
  2. Under the articles of confederation, if Virginia had ten thousand citizens and Delaware had five thousand citizens, how many votes would each state have in the legislature? <u>brainly.com/question/9935193</u>
  3. In the Supreme Court’s decision in Korematsu v. United States, the court said that Korematsu? <u>brainly.com/question/8391589</u>

Answer Details:

Grade: High school

Subject: US History  

Chapter: Supreme Court

Keywords: Heller, District of Columbia, United States, Second Amendment, military service, self-defense, Supreme Court, district, law court, Parker, Firearms Control Regulation act

olasank [31]3 years ago
7 0
Even though im not writing the 2 paragraphs let me give you info about one of the cases: <span>Gibbons vs. Ogden: Federally issued permit vs. State (NY) issued permit to navigate waterways around New York. Marshall court re-emphasized Article VI (Supremacy) stating that federal law trumps state and this decision further emphasized the Commerce Clause stating that commerce was not defined solely as the buying and selling of goods, but the transportation thereof as well. Establishing that only the national Congress had the ability to regulate interstate trade, further strengthening the federal government over the states. This case as many affect the nature of federalism regarding its power, rights and roles. </span>
You might be interested in
How do geographic location and economic/social status influence the motives and roles of South Carolinians over the debate for I
yanalaym [24]
Wait I know u still need the answer or not anymore
5 0
3 years ago
3. How is world history defined?a. It examines history from a global perspective.b. It examines the history of the United States
mel-nik [20]
B . It examines history from a global perspective
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these did NOT contribute to the decline of the Roman Empire? A the cost of maintaining huge armies B conflicts over imp
algol [13]

Answer:

Correct answer is C the adoption of a strict moral legal code.

Explanation:

A is not correct because Roman empire had to pay a large amounts of money to maintain the costs of administration and army, and this was especially problematic after they were not able to conquer new territories.

B is not correct as this conflicts were destroying Roman Empire from the inside, especially in the 3rd Century. It brought political and economical decline.

C is correct as this laws were created to prevent the decline of Empire, but it was too late. Diocletian was the one who started this reforms.

D is not correct as they used mercenaries from Germanic tribes, who at the end destroyed the Empire.

8 0
3 years ago
Why did the colonist feel the need to revolt against the British and govern themselves
andriy [413]

Because the British government was taxing them heavily.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do you think the Republicans rejected negotiating a peace settlement in 1864 and instead demanded the unconditional surrende
algol [13]

It is first important to understand that not all Republicans rejected a peace settlement with the Confederates during or after the Civil War, but it was a smaller group within the party that totally and completely refused and demanded a full surrender without conditions to the South. This group was called the Radical Republicans and they began around 1854 and went until after the Reconstruction of 1877. They were the ones who were responsible for the establishment of the Fourteenth Ammendment and they radically opposed any negotiations with the South on the basis of their being totally against segregation and slavery. Some other factions within the Republican party, including Lincoln, were more moderate and were willing to give in to some of the demands from the Confederates, especially ont he issue of slaves.

The reason for these radical Republicans not wanting to negotiate with the Southern Confederates, was that they refused to allow slavery to continue. They were pushing for all slaves in the U.S to be freed, for segregation to be prohibited, for rights for black people to be established in the United States and even went as far as pushing for civil rights, including suffrage, for African Americans. But the South, of course, refused these terms. This is why neither Radical Republicans, nor Confederate members would have been able to settle anything in a negotiation. There was no common ground for the toughest issue of all; slavery.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was von steubens role
    10·2 answers
  • Which qualifications for service in the Senate demonstrates the Senate’s increased political power?
    11·1 answer
  • Will you help me write a paper for history
    5·1 answer
  • What organization was established
    8·1 answer
  • What form of electricity killed the wheat and other crops in the dust bowl?
    5·1 answer
  • You have to answer this questions I will mark you as a brainliest ​
    5·1 answer
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
    13·2 answers
  • What landmark United States Supreme Court case allowed this policy to occur?
    5·1 answer
  • The first ten amendments to the US Constitution are also known as the
    7·2 answers
  • In 2022, how many times has a Simpsons prediction come true?​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!