1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
emmasim [6.3K]
3 years ago
12

When graphing inequalities, and you divide y by a negative number, do you switch the symbol?

Mathematics
1 answer:
xz_007 [3.2K]3 years ago
4 0
Yes you need to! And you need to be careful not to forgot that when doing your calculations!!
You might be interested in
Joaquim earns a salary of $4,000 per month plus a 6% commision on all of his sales. He wants to earn more than 7,000 next month.
andrew11 [14]

Answer:

s=salary

x=sales

s ≥ 4,000 + .06x

Step-by-step explanation:


3 0
3 years ago
The same as has greater then less than plz anwser I am struggling
xeze [42]
For each power of ten , the number of zeros written in the product is the same as the number of exponents.
3 0
3 years ago
Find the slope of f(x)=5x-4
frosja888 [35]

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help and explain how you solved it. Thanks.
galina1969 [7]

Answer:

This is 0.14 to the nearest hundredth

Step-by-step explanation:

Firstly we list the parameters;

Drive to school = 40

Take the bus = 50

Walk = 10

Sophomore = 30

Junior = 35

Senior = 35

Total number of students in sample is 100

Let W be the event that a student walked to school

So P(w) = 10/100 = 0.1

Let S be the event that a student is a senior

P(S) = 35/100 = 0.35

The probability we want to calculate can be said to be;

Probability that a student walked to school given that he is a senior

This can be represented and calculated as follows;

P( w| s) = P( w n s) / P(s)

w n s is the probability that a student walked to school and he is a senior

We need to know the number of seniors who walked to school

From the table, this is 5/100 = 0.05

So the Conditional probability is as follows;

P(W | S ) = 0.05/0.35 = 0.1429

To the nearest hundredth, that is 0.14

3 0
3 years ago
Let the number of chocolate chips in a certain type of cookie have a Poisson distribution. We want the probability that a cookie
ludmilkaskok [199]

Answer:

\lambda \geq 6.63835

Step-by-step explanation:

The Poisson Distribution is "a discrete probability distribution that expresses the probability of a given number of events occurring in a fixed interval of time or space if these events occur with a known constant mean rate and independently of the time since the last event".

Let X the random variable that represent the number of chocolate chips in a certain type of cookie. We know that X \sim Poisson(\lambda)

The probability mass function for the random variable is given by:

f(x)=\frac{e^{-\lambda} \lambda^x}{x!} , x=0,1,2,3,4,...

And f(x)=0 for other case.

For this distribution the expected value is the same parameter \lambda

E(X)=\mu =\lambda

On this case we are interested on the probability of having at least two chocolate chips, and using the complement rule we have this:

P(X\geq 2)=1-P(X

Using the pmf we can find the individual probabilities like this:

P(X=0)=\frac{e^{-\lambda} \lambda^0}{0!}=e^{-\lambda}

P(X=1)=\frac{e^{-\lambda} \lambda^1}{1!}=\lambda e^{-\lambda}

And replacing we have this:

P(X\geq 2)=1-[P(X=0)+P(X=1)]=1-[e^{-\lambda} +\lambda e^{-\lambda}[]

P(X\geq 2)=1-e^{-\lambda}(1+\lambda)

And we want this probability that at least of 99%, so we can set upt the following inequality:

P(X\geq 2)=1-e^{-\lambda}(1+\lambda)\geq 0.99

And now we can solve for \lambda

0.01 \geq e^{-\lambda}(1+\lambda)

Applying natural log on both sides we have:

ln(0.01) \geq ln(e^{-\lambda}+ln(1+\lambda)

ln(0.01) \geq -\lambda+ln(1+\lambda)

\lambda-ln(1+\lambda)+ln(0.01) \geq 0

Thats a no linear equation but if we use a numerical method like the Newthon raphson Method or the Jacobi method we find a good point of estimate for the solution.

Using the Newthon Raphson method, we apply this formula:

x_{n+1}=x_n -\frac{f(x_n)}{f'(x_n)}

Where :

f(x_n)=\lambda -ln(1+\lambda)+ln(0.01)

f'(x_n)=1-\frac{1}{1+\lambda}

Iterating as shown on the figure attached we find a final solution given by:

\lambda \geq 6.63835

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The volume of a cone is 47.1 units. What is the height of the cone?
    5·1 answer
  • What percent of the recorded time did the worker spend traveling?
    6·1 answer
  • Use the Pythagorean Theorem to find the distance between points E and H. A) 3 2 B) 4 2 C) 14 D) 21
    14·2 answers
  • If y varies directly with x and y is -6 when x is 2, what is x when y is -22?
    13·1 answer
  • Find the height of the triangle with area 280 sq cm and base 14 cm.
    14·2 answers
  • Judy is scuba diving at -7 meters, Nelda is scuba diving at -9 meters, and Rod is scuba diving at -3 meters. List the divers in
    11·2 answers
  • In a triangle, what is always opposite the angle that has the LEAST measure?
    6·2 answers
  • Pl help me it’s for homework
    7·1 answer
  • The length of a rectangle is 10cm greater than it's width,the perimeter is 70cm.find the length nd width
    9·1 answer
  • A similar scale model of a building is 12 in tall and 9 in wide. If the actual building is 100 ft tall, how wide is the building
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!