Answer:
Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.
Explanation:
Google i hope that this helps
C. Most Africans farm at the subsistence level.
A. corporation. monopoly is when you own more that on big company at a time
Answer:
Both were absolutist governors with total control of their countries
Explanation:
Now let's see each case.
Toyotomi Hideyoshi was responsible to unify Japan in the 16th century. He put an end to the power of the feudal lords and acquired the political and military position becoming the main governor of Japan. To maintain power, Hideyoshi used the force and the threat, persecuting his enemies.
Louis XIV name himself as The King Sun, and just like Hideyoshi, Louis XIV cumulated the political and social power, but in the case of him, the maintaining of the status quo was based on religion. This means that, according to Louis XIV, his power and influence came from God.
The defenders of slavery had passed the arguments used to challenge the system.
Explanation:
The arguments used to challenge this system are
Some people in the south argued that slavery was actually good for the slaves. Many of them believed that slaveholders providing these 'lesser beings' with religion, sustenance and shelter was an act of kindness towards them.
Equally, many in the south believed that slavery was preferable to the factory work and people can do in the north.
Most of the people were worried that without slavery, the economy would crumble. Several elements of trade and production were reliant upon slavery, and so many southerners argued that slavery could not be abolished, in the interest of prosperity.
