1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ladessa [460]
3 years ago
6

The mean cholesterol levels of women age 45-59 in Ghana, Nigeria, and Seychelles is 5.1 mmol/1 and the standard deviation is 1.0

mmol/l (Lawes, Hoorn, Law & Rodgers, 2004). Assume that cholesterol levels are normally distributed. a.) State the random variable. b) Find the probability that a woman age 45-59 in Ghana has a cholesterol level above 6.2 mmol/l (considered a high level). c.) Suppose doctors decide to test the woman's cholesterol level again and average the two values. Find the probability that this woman's mean cholesterol level for the two tests is above 6.2 mmo/l. d.) Suppose doctors being very conservative decide to test the woman's cholesterol level a third time and average the three values. Find the probability that this woman's mean cholesterol level for the three tests is above 6.2 mmol1 e.) If the sample mean cholesterol level for this woman after three tests is above 6.2 mmol/M, what could you conclude?
Mathematics
1 answer:
tatiyna3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

a) N(\mu = 5.1 \, , \, \sigma = 1)

b) The probability that a woman cholesterol is above 6.2 mmol/l is 0.1357

c) The probability that the sample mean cholesterol level of two tests is above 6.2 mmol/l is 0.0594

d) For three tests, the probability that the sample mean cholesterol level  is above 6.2 mmol/l is 0.0281

e) We can conclude with 95% confidence that the woman has a high level of cholesterol level.

Step-by-step explanation:

a) The random variable is N(\mu = 5.1 \, , \, \sigma = 1) .

b) Lets call X the random variable. We will standarize X to obtain a standard normal random variable W

W = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma} = X-5.1 \approx N(0,1)

The values of the cummulative distribution function of the standard normal random variable W, which we will denote by \phi , are tabulated and they can be found in the attached file. We will use this values to find the probability of X being greater than 6.2

P(X > 6.2) = P(X-5.1 > 6.2-5.1) = P(W > 1.1) ) 1- \phi(1.1) = 1-0.8643 = 0.1357

Thus, the probability that a woman cholesterol is above 6.2 mmol/l is 0.1357.

c) If we take the mean of two normal random variables X1, X2 independent and with equal mean and standard deviation, then we will obtain a Normal random variable Z with the same mean (5.1) and the standard deviation is obtained by taking the standard deviation of any of the two variables divided by the square root of the sample length, in other words, by √2. This means that the mean distribution Z will have distribution N(\mu = 5.1, \sigma = 1/\sqrt{2}) .

We standarize Z to obtain (another) W as before,

W = \frac{Z - 5.1}{1/\sqrt{2}} \approx N(0,1)

And now we compute the probability of Z being greater than 1/√2 using the cummulative function \phi

P(Z > 6.2) = P(W > \frac{6.2-5.1}{1/\sqrt{2}}) = P(W > 1.56) = 1-\phi(1.56)\\ = 1-0.9406 = 0.0594

Thus, the probability that the sample mean cholesterol level is above 6.2 mmol/l is 0.0594.

d) For three values we will have a sample mean Z with mean 5.1 as before and standard deviation \sigma = 1/\sqrt{3} . The standarization therefore is

W = \frac{Z-5.1}{1/\sqrt{3}}) \approx N(0,1)

And the probability of Z being greater than 6.2 in this case is

P(Z > 6.2) = P(W > \frac{6.2-5.1}{1/\sqrt{3}}) = P(W > 1.91) = 1-\phi(1.91)\\ = 1-0.9719 = 0.0281

As a result, the probability that the sample mean is greater than 6.2 mmol/l is 0.0281.

e) The sample mean being greater than 6.2 mmol/l only happens with probability 0.0281. This means that 97.19% of the woman will have a cholesterol level below that amount, and as a consecuence, this woman has a high level of cholesterol.

Download pdf
You might be interested in
3x^2 -5x -2=0
Kipish [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Find two numbers that add to make the coefficient of x (in this case, -5) and that multiply to make the constant term multiplied by the coefficient of x^2 (in this case, -2 x 3 = -6)

Two numbers that work are -6 and +1

-6 x +1 = -6

-6 + -1 = -5

2. Split the middle term into the two numbers that you found.

3x^2 -6x +x -2 = 0

I've put the -6 on the left side because in our next step, when we factorise, it will be easier than having the numbers the other way around.

3. Factorise the left side by taking out common factors from each pair. The pairs I'm talking about here are '3x^2 and -6x', and 'x and -2'

3x (x-2) +1 (x-2) = 0

4. You now have two numbers both being multiplied by the term x-2. We can rearrange this equation to give us two brackets being multiplied by each other.

(3x + 1) (x-2) = 0

5. According to the Null Factor Law, if two terms are multiplied together and the result is 0, then one of those terms must be 0. Make both terms equal to 0 and solve each for x.

3x + 1 = 0              x-2 = 0

3x = -1                   x = 2

x = -1/3

6. The solutions to this equation are x = 2 and x = -1/3

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which value of x makes the equation 0.5(x + 16) = 3 + 0.25(x – 4) true?
Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:it is confusing

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Carl is boarding a plane. He has 2 checked bags of equal weight and a backpack that weighs 4 kg. The total weight of Carl's bagg
aniked [119]
<span>Carl has 3 bags in total. One backpack weighs 4 kg and the rest two checking bags have the equal weight. The total weight of 3 bags is given to be 35 kg.

Let the weight of each checking bag is w kg. So we can write:

2 x (Weight of a checking bag) + Weight of Backpack = 35

Using the values, we get:

2w+ 4 = 35

Using this equation we can find the weight of each checking bag, as shown below.

2w = 31

w = 31/2

w = 15.5

Thus, the weight of each checking bag is 15.5 kg
</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suppose that, from measurements in a microscope, you determine that a certain bacterium covers an area of 1.50μm2. Convert this
galben [10]
1 m = 1 x 10⁶ μm
1 m² = (1 x 10⁶)² μm²
1 m² = 1 x 10¹² μm²

area = 1.5 / 1 x 10¹²  m²
Area = 1.5 x 10⁻¹² m²
7 0
3 years ago
I need a bit of help with this, May you please help me?<br>15 points. ​
max2010maxim [7]

The answer is 7 feet becaise 0 opp ik

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is 6x^2-2x+1=0 plz help
    7·1 answer
  • What is the simple intrest of $1,200 at 3.5% for 2 years.
    10·2 answers
  • Clarissa has a budget of $1,200 a month to spend for rent and food. She has already spent $928 this month. Which inequality repr
    8·2 answers
  • For each part, first decide which of the three methods sections will most easily enable you to sketch the surface. These are the
    15·1 answer
  • The sum of 2 consecutive #s is 1893. Find the numbers
    10·1 answer
  • <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=f%20-%20354%20%3D%201221" id="TexFormula1" title="f - 354 = 1221" alt="f - 354 = 1221" align="
    8·1 answer
  • A jeweler is making a triangular pendant. He has two sides of length 23 mm and 31 mm. What are the possible lengths (in whole mm
    14·1 answer
  • Help I need help!!! please!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Express your answer as a decimal.<br><br> 3÷2=
    12·2 answers
  • Find the area of the shaded region
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!