Answer:
The main reason the colonists were angry, historians say, was because Britain had rejected the concept of 'no taxation without representation.' At that time, almost no colonists chose to be independent of Britain. But all of them, as British citizens, respected their rights and the principle of local self-rule.
Explanation:
The House of Representatives have the ability to elect the President in the case of an electoral college tie. Even though this power is not used often, it is a critical part of their job. They must consider numerous factors including what citizens of their district would want, what would help American society, etc. Ultimately, this type of responsibility defines the members of the House as individuals who need to be impartial and reasonable in order to make the decision that is best for the country.
The acts took away self-governance and historic rights of Massachusetts, triggering outrage and resistance in the Thirteen Colonies. They were key developments in the outbreak of the American Revolution in 1775.<span>Repression struck the colonists through the passing of a series of laws.</span>
Answer:
Alexander was “great” because he easily conquered a lot of land and established prominent societies, like Alexandria.
Alexander wasn’t “great” because he was egotistical in naming a city after him and conquering land just for greed.
Alexander was “great” because he was smart enough to cross the river and use Porus’ own elephants against him.
Alexander was not “great” because he tricked a ruler and killed many men in war only because he was greedy and wanted more land.
Alexander was most likely very religious, and it seems that in Ancient Greek anyone seeking refuge in a temple should be shown mercy. Also, if Alexander had killed everyone in the city than there would have been no point in conquering the city except for land.
Speaker of the House of Representatives
