Answer: if we say the word directory in history we are referring undoubtedly to the French directory which was a five-member committee that governed after the revolution in 1799. The main problem was the struggle for power within the directory between royalists and radical revolutionaries. The directory was afraid that the royalist would look for help in other monarchies in Europe.
Explanation:
When the Directory came into power, it was faced with many problems including widespread famine, civil war, internal corruption, and war with neighboring countries. There was also a struggle for power within the directory between royalists and radical revolutionaries.
Answer:
Explanation:
He has shown small amounts of kindness in a very traumatic situation. (insert an example of when he showed kindness to her). This is also known as Stockholm syndrome. Stockholm syndrome is where a a captive becomes attached to their takers for showing small amounts of kindness in terrible situation.
Radical. Radical is the answer you are looking for.
Answer:
<em>The interest groups on the first Amendment allowed people to assemble together to speak their opinions and rights.</em>
<em>In 1971 the Federal Election Campaign Act was passed, setting limits on how people donate money in public disclosure of campaign.</em>
Explanation:
<em>People or individual would concur with me that interest groups under the Constitution have their right to encourage a particular point of view. What most people do not agree at some point, however, this is the level that some interest group influence activities preserved under the First constitution,
</em>
<em>
In addition to rights of free speech the First constitution allows people the right to come together. for example pluralists states that assembling in groups is normal and that people will tend to move toward others with same views</em>
<em>As of today, the debate about interest groups often circulates around whether the First Amendment shields the rights of groups and individuals to lend money, and if government can control the use of this money. </em>
<em>In 1971, the Federal Election Campaign Act was passed, setting limits on how much money presidential and vice-presidential candidates and their families could provide for their own campaigns.it also made unions and cooperation's to form PACs and expected public disclosure of campaign donations and their sources. </em>
<em>In 1 the year 1974, the act was modified in a way to control the amount of money used on congressional campaigns. </em>
There is not much that they agreed on, and much of it is based on who you ask. They did however mutually agree that the US was different than other nations and that it was better.
