That depends which "Protestant ministers" you would have in mind. Protestantism has wide disparities within its ranks, and not all were on the same page. In the 19th century, most churches still stood against women's equality. But movements toward women's suffrage included many Protestant women, and beginning in the late 19th century liberal Protestantism was more likely to be in support of such movements. However, there remained (and still remain) many very conservative and traditional Protestant churches that are averse to giving women an equal role with men, basing their views on interpretations of Bible verses about men and women. They've tended to acknowledge women voting in political society as a reality, but keep women in a secondary place within the church's organization.
Catholic leaders in the 19th century maintained that women's suffrage was "an affront to divine law and the natural order and a threat to family and society," according to Susan Hill Lindley in the book, <em>You Have Stepped Out of Your Place: A History of Women and Religion in America </em>(1996).
After decades of stagnation and stagnation, unexpected outbreaks in more than one Arab country, popular revolutions overthrew regimes, shook the throne of other systems, and created a new reality at the political and social level was not quickly formed and the depth of the changes to notify the most optimistic observers, in late 2010 The beginning of 2011 erupted a wave of revolutions and protests across the Arab world began with Mohamed Bouazizi and the Tunisian revolution, which sparked the spark in many Arab countries and known that period in the Arab revolutions. One of the reasons for these sudden protests is the spread of corruption, economic stagnation and poor living conditions, as well as political constraints and overall poor conditions in the Arab countries.
Answer:
The process of taking on the characteristics of a culture by giving up one's own is called cultural assimilation. ... One of the most obvious examples of assimilation is the United States' history of absorbing immigrants from different countries.
Explanation:
I really hope this helps you!
<u><em>Basically for political interests and expansion. </em></u>
<u><em>Infact new leaders could be found in the different new cultures in case of problems with America or Europe. Through the conquest and migration, Polynesian culture was introduced in the isles too, beyond the initial territories</em></u>
