1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tresset [83]
3 years ago
11

How did the debate of state’s rights lead to civil war

History
2 answers:
Mazyrski [523]3 years ago
8 0

What Are States' Rights?

The Civil War<em> is believed by most to be caused because of the issue of slavery. Some, however, believe that it was actually about states' rights, or the rights of states to govern themselves outside of the control of the federal government. Whenever states' rights arguments are made, they all eventually come back to slavery. States' rights were simply a convenient political debate to fit the slavery argument into. </em>

<em> </em>

<em>The American Civil War was, ultimately, about one thing: slavery. However, other issues found their way into the debate as well. Arguably the most significant of these was the issue of states' rights. The idea of states' rights, at its most basic level, is the idea that the states that make up the United States of America should have individual rights to work as their own independent governments beyond the control of the national government. For example, while most states in the U.S. have a minimum driving age of sixteen years, it is actually up to each individual state to decide. In South Dakota, for instance, the driving age is actually fourteen. This is generally believed to be due to the large farming population that requires the help of young teens on family farms, often requiring that these teens drive trucks or tractors to tend to crops and livestock, but there is no legislative evidence for this belief. In New Jersey, the minimum driving age is seventeen, the highest in the country. There have been efforts in the past decades to impose a national law for the driving similar to the national drinking age in 1985, but these efforts have not been successful as of 2017.</em>

spayn [35]3 years ago
5 0

The Civil War is believed by most to be caused because of the issue of slavery. ... Whenever states' rights arguments are made, they all eventually come back to slavery. States' rights were simply a convenient political debate to fit the slavery argument into.

You might be interested in
Who were John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie? What did they have in common and how were they different?
zhuklara [117]

John D. Rockefeller went into business when he was 20, and he picked up his first oil well as a sideline. He soon saw that that was the right horse to ride. Even before automobiles and airplanes laid their heavy claim on oil, it'd begun replacing coal in the power industries.

Andrew Carnegie makes the better hero. He, after all, was part and parcel of the emerging technologies that made our country. And his giving sprang from some deep-seated core of principle. Yet the Rockefeller clan assumed the mantle of public service. They've become political leaders and professional givers -- one died doing anthropological research in New Guinea.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the difference between the three types of labor that was used in the south after the civil war to replace slave labor?
ICE Princess25 [194]
Stuff like not killing them.

7 0
3 years ago
What was the Inquisition?
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

2

Explanation:

Hope it helps!

4 0
3 years ago
50 points<br> Discuss the positive and negative impacts of the anti-war movement.
rosijanka [135]

Answer:

Explanation:

The anti-war movement is a movement of group or individual usually in opposition or against a particular country or government decision to start a war or being involved in an armed conflicts

The Major positive impact of anti-war movement is that

1) The movement work through protest or other available means either by matching or placard waving to make efforts in making the government to put an end to a particular war or conflicts. This is turn leads to avoidance of casualty which would or maybe recorded in the conflict or war.

2) it makes the government accountable to it citizens

3) it leads to curbing of resources wastage

Some of the negative impart of anti-war is

1) Such movement might be highjacked by the opposition there using the movement for personal ambition or motives which is contrary to the main motive the movement was formed.

2) The protest may leads to violence there causing harm to people and property.

6 0
3 years ago
The largest group of non-willing immigrants to America were taken from
Anuta_ua [19.1K]
<span>The largest group of non-willing immigrants to America were taken from "Africa," since it was Africans who worked in the fields in the American South (which was the area that contained the most slaves). </span>
8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the federal reserve act designed to prevent
    10·1 answer
  • One major goal of NASA’s Gemini program was to
    13·2 answers
  • Why do changing perceptions about our society today affect history
    10·2 answers
  • Why were our ancestors known as Homo sapiens?
    5·1 answer
  • If the setting of a story is in a family's living room, which character most closely connects with this setting?
    15·1 answer
  • How many of the 5 of the original 13 states slave states? How many were free states?
    7·2 answers
  • Select ALL the Allies during World War II.
    13·1 answer
  • Question 3 of 10
    13·1 answer
  • Why were there famines during the British raj?
    10·1 answer
  • Do you know this for social studies
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!