1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hram777 [196]
2 years ago
8

What was the effect of the Boston Massacre on the colonists?

History
1 answer:
valentina_108 [34]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The colonists did not want to give the British a pretext for retaliation, and so preparations were made to ensure a fair trial. A young lawyer named John Adams, despite his commitment to the revolutionary cause, agreed to defend the Redcoats, all but two of whom were acquitted. Even though British troops were recalled from Boston, the incident inflamed hostilities and intensified revolutionary sentiment among the colonists. For the revolutionaries, the so-called massacre demonstrated the corrupting influence of standing armies and the tyranny of the British. It was a major signpost on the road to revolution; indeed, John Adams later claimed that the “foundation of American independence was laid” that fateful day of March 5, 1770.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Who was elizabeth cady stanton and what was her significance!!
EastWind [94]

Answer:

Elizabeth Cady Stanton was an abolitionist, human rights activist and one of the first leaders of the woman's rights movement. She came from a privileged background and decided early in life to fight for equal rights for women.

Spouse: Henry Brewster Stanton, Jr.

Works written: Declaration of Sentiments, The ...

Born: November 12, 1815, Johnstown

Died: October 26, 1902:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the cause for a major change in labor systems during the industrial revolution​
Kamila [148]
With new technological advancements there was no longer a need for as many workers and companies could now pay workers less due to the job being easier, in some countries such as England or the US this lead to revolts and rebellions, the likes of which paved the foundation of communism
6 0
2 years ago
How does the following saying end, "When the press fails;_______________"? Question options: A blogger takes its place Elections
Akimi4 [234]

I think it is democracy fails but correct me if I am wrong please

3 0
3 years ago
Which statement is true about Richard Nixon and Lyndon Johnson’s social and economic policies?
andriy [413]

Answer:

B. Johnson supported Medicare and the Civil Rights movement, while Nixon supported state block grants and created stagflation.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Compare and contrast the changes in the government, economy, and society from the Romanov era under the tsar to the rule by the
Tresset [83]

The rulers of the Soviet Union viewed empire and imperialism in ideological terms as ‘the highest and final stage of capitalism’.1 By this Leninist definition, the Soviet Union did not identify itself as an empire, and instead, its leaders vehemently denounced imperialism that was carried out by its enemies and competitors: the capitalist states. Despite its own anguish over being identified as an empire, the Soviet Union indeed was one. While the meaning of ‘empire’ has shifted over time, for the purposes of this paper the definition of empire is in the sense of a great power, a polity, ruling over vast territories and people, leaving a significant impact on the history of world civilizations.2 As the characteristics of the Soviet Union are examined, support for viewing the USSR as an empire grows.

The Soviet Union emerged after the Russian Revolution of 1917. The Tsarist Russian Empire’s government was overthrown by the local soviets, led by the Bolsheviks. The Bolsheviks attempted to replace the Russian empire with a communist one, in which socialism would make nationalismobsolete and in place there would be a supra-national imperial ideology.3 Still, coming back to the issue of ‘empire’, the Soviet Union clearly maintained a commanding control over multi-ethnic and multi-linguistic societies that surpassed the extent of the preceding Imperial Russia Empire. A question thus arises: was the USSR a Russian empire? The first aspect to consider is if the USSR was a continuation of Russian imperialist power or if an intrinsic distinction can be made between the two. What is notable to address is what is meant by ‘Russian’ identity and nationality, its formation, and reshaping through time. Once this will be accounted for, this paper will move on with an answer to the question: the USSR was indeed an essentially different empire from the one preceding it, and thus, the USSR was not a Russian empire.


8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What trend does this map demonstrate about the migration patterns of hunter-gatherers?
    13·2 answers
  • WHAT IS THE DEFINITION OF PSYCHOLOGY?
    14·2 answers
  • Who discovered that space and time are relative
    12·2 answers
  • How can the Jewish belief in charity be seen in the Western world? Leaders are required to follow the same rules as the people.
    11·1 answer
  • If a farmer in ancient China wanted rain, why might he pray to an ancestor?
    14·2 answers
  • What is the definition of sputnik in your own words
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a factor in causing the Cold War after<br> World War 11?<br> Select one
    6·1 answer
  • Explain how the powers of the Supreme Court and federal law were extended by significant court cases
    10·1 answer
  • Marking brainliest!!!!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • Do you think persecution of Christians made Christianity weaker or stronger? Explain.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!