1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yanka [14]
3 years ago
15

Which of the following applies to the Roosevelt Corollary? The United States would give up its territories in the Pacific. The U

nited States would not seek any new territories in the Americas. The United States would limit business investments in Latin America. 99 PTS.
History
2 answers:
MArishka [77]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The answer is The United States would not seek any new territories in the Americas. Just had this question.

Explanation:

Tasya [4]3 years ago
5 0
The answer is B!!!!!!!!!

You might be interested in
How did the growth of resistance movements in Eastern Europe lead to the collapse of the Soviet Union?
UNO [17]

Answer: An internal movement to dissolve the Soviet Union developed.

Explanation: History class confirmed

3 0
2 years ago
Which of the following statements is false about city tenements during the late nineteenth century?
Snowcat [4.5K]
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "D. People lived in very unsafe and crime ridden neighborhoods." The statement that is false about city tenements during the late nineteenth century is that <span>D. People lived in very unsafe and crime ridden neighborhoods </span>
6 0
3 years ago
plymouth colony started as an independent colony until a. it was annexed by the massachusetts bay colony. b. king james turned i
Lina20 [59]
It was annexed by the Massachusetts bay colony
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following best explains how popular sovereignty was related to slavery?
jek_recluse [69]
What are the choices?
3 0
2 years ago
President Reagan’s speech at the Brandenburg gate commonlit
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer: here you go:

Explanation:

We come to Berlin, we American Presidents, because it's our duty to speak, in this place, of freedom. But I must confess, we're drawn here by other things as well: by the feeling of history in this city, more than 500 years older than our own nation; by the beauty of the Grunewald and the Tiergarten; most of all, by your courage and determination. Perhaps the composer, Paul Lincke, understood something about American Presidents. You see, like so many Presidents before me, I come here today because wherever I go, whatever I do: "Ich hab noch einen koffer in Berlin." [I still have a suitcase in Berlin.]

Our gathering today is being broadcast throughout Western Europe and North America. I understand that it is being seen and heard as well in the East. To those listening throughout Eastern Europe, I extend my warmest greetings and the good will of the American people. To those listening in East Berlin, a special word: Although I cannot be with you, I address my remarks to you just as surely as to those standing here before me. For I join you, as I join your fellow countrymen in the West, in this firm, this unalterable belief: Es gibt nur ein Berlin. [There is only one Berlin.]

...

And now the Soviets themselves may, in a limited way, be coming to understand the importance of freedom. We hear much from Moscow about a new policy of reform and openness. Some political prisoners have been released. Certain foreign news broadcasts are no longer being jammed. Some economic enterprises have been permitted to operate with greater freedom from state control. Are these the beginnings of profound changes in the Soviet state? Or are they token gestures, intended to raise false hopes in the West, or to strengthen the Soviet system without changing it? We welcome change and openness; for we believe that freedom and security go together, that the advance of human liberty can only strengthen the cause of world peace.

There is one sign the Soviets can make that would be unmistakable, that would advance dramatically the cause of freedom and peace. General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!

...

As I looked out a moment ago from the Reichstag, that embodiment of German unity, I noticed words crudely spray-painted upon the wall, perhaps by a young Berliner, "This wall will fall. Beliefs become reality." Yes, across Europe, this wall will fall. For it cannot withstand faith; it cannot withstand truth. The wall cannot withstand freedom.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is Don Quixote considered to be a humanist work?
    9·2 answers
  • Both Iraq under Saddam Hussein and Syria under Bashar al-Assad shared which difficulty?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the basic meaning of the word epic?
    5·2 answers
  • What “grade” would you give Hoover and his handling of the Depression? Why?
    8·1 answer
  • Can someone pls help with this?? i need it done in an hour
    14·2 answers
  • The system of checks and balances helps keep any one branch from gaining to much power. How is that system applied to the presid
    12·1 answer
  • Do page 89 question 6 the book: my world american history
    9·1 answer
  • How did the defeat of the Tartars lead to Temujin becoming Genghis Khan?
    13·2 answers
  • All of the following were motives for the Crusades except a. the desire to gain riches and land. b. to allow the pope to assume
    11·1 answer
  • resentment over domestic and foreign policy, economic issues, and tax issues led to shay's rebellion in 1786.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!