The Kansas–Nebraska Act of 1854 was an organic act that created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska. It was drafted by Democratic Senator Stephen A. Douglas, passed by the 33rd United States Congress, and signed into law by President Franklin Pierce. Douglas introduced the bill with the goal of opening up new lands to development and facilitating construction of a transcontinental railroad, but the Kansas–Nebraska Act is most notable for effectively repealing the Missouri Compromise, stoking national tensions over slavery, and contributing to a series of armed conflicts known as "Bleeding Kansas".
The United States had acquired vast amounts of sparsely-settled land in the 1803 Louisiana Purchase, and since the 1840s Douglas had sought to establish a territorial government in a portion of the Louisiana Purchase that was still unorganized. Douglas's efforts were stymied by Senator David Rice Atchison and other Southern leaders who refused to allow the creation of territories that banned slavery; slavery would have been banned because the Missouri Compromise outlawed slavery in territory north of latitude 36°30' north. To win the support of Southerners like Atchison, Pierce and Douglas agreed to back the repeal of the Missouri Compromise, with the status of slavery instead decided on the basis of "popular sovereignty." Under popular sovereignty, the citizens of each territory, rather than Congress, would determine whether or not slavery would be allowed.
Answer:
D. repeal the Stamp Act.
Explanation:
The Shay Rebellion was an armed uprising in Massachusetts, mainly in and around Springfield in 1786 and 1787. The American veteran of the United States War of Independence Daniel Shays led four thousand rebels (called shaysites) in a protest against the perceived economic and civil injustices. Shays was a farmer from Massachusetts at the start of the War of Independence; He joined the Continental Army, participated in the battles of Lexington and Concord, Battle of Bunker Hill and Saratoga Battles, and was finally wounded in combat.
In my opinion, yes, there are still groups who are disenfranchised and not considered as an equal source of power in our democracy. An example of these people is those in the lower class of the society. In today's setting, only the 'representatives' have power and those whom they represent do not. <span />
is is true it is on the southwest corner of Africa, where Asia, Europe and Africa meet.
it is true
They made use of the resources around them is one reason why early clans of hunter-gatherers are not considered civilizations. When you talk about civilizations, it means that people are building something or forming a society for development.
