1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sveta_85 [38]
3 years ago
13

1. Give three reasons why or why not we should keep the Electoral College. And based on what you choose, tell me one reason for

the opposing viewpoint.
Law
1 answer:
finlep [7]3 years ago
4 0

Electoral College was ensured to be the best method to select a president as well as considered as an old method in the present government.

<u>Explanation:</u>

REASONS WHY ONE SHOULD KEEP THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE

  1. The founding Fathers enacted Electoral College for the welfare of the society. They believed the voting of a huge population wouldn't do better of a country but by the educated scholars who would know who to vote.
  2. With the involvement of Electoral College, the constitution believed that the counselors would do what they promised and cannot stop doing the good social deeds for the society that they had promised.
  3. As it was based on the popular vote, it promises the outcome of the presidential election.

REASONS WHY ONE SHOULD NOT KEEP THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE

  1. As the Electoral College takes the interest of the educated scholars the focus of the people is ignored which builds a great barrier towards the people and the government.
  2. The ignorance of the society makes the constitution depend on the 'swing states' and neglect other states.
  3. In today's time, the voters do not really focus on the methods of the Electoral College as it has turned irrelevant and considered something really old.

Electoral College was ensured to be the best method to select a president as well as considered as an old method in the present government.

You might be interested in
PLS ANSWER/HELP: Which element distinguishes routine activity theory from situational crime prevention?
Tanzania [10]

Answer:

The correct answer is B. The presence of an overbearing guardian distinguishes routine activity theory from situational crime prevention.

Explanation:

Situational crime prevention is a criminal theory that establishes that all crime can be stopped before its development if the situations or contextual conditions that favor its development are modified.

Thus, the presence of a policeman in a certain place, for example, modifies the context for the criminal, who knows that he will not be able to carry out his crime in the place where this policeman is. Thus, the presence of a guard limits the development of the crime, by modifying the context in which the criminal seeks to develop his activity.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
'Victimhood is not an objective assessment of harm
IrinaK [193]

Answer:

This concept is used by European countries.

Explanation:

The concept of Victimhood adopted by the European countries especially United States of America to invade Afghanistan and control the Asian region. The 9/11 incident is caused by the America itself to get a sympathy vote and a reason just like the incident of pearl harbor to invade Afghanistan to control the region. The main aim of these European countries to control the spreading of communism and not to control the terrorist so this Victimhood helps many countries to get their goals.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is one of the major arguments against term limits for state legislators?
Olin [163]
Need more information to answer this particular question.
4 0
3 years ago
The Case of ...
ratelena [41]

Answer:

its b kdkdkdkdkdkdksdjdjd

3 0
3 years ago
Hi PLEASE HELP ASAP.!! so back in pro-life month, my teacher and I had a little argument over something literally so silly. It w
lapo4ka [179]

There are several reasons why Ted Bundy deserved the death penalty. He killed a lot of people

<h3>Reasons why the death penalty was an adequate punishment for Ted Bundy:</h3>
  • He killed a lot of people in the society.
  • He was a predator.
  • He raped people.
  • He was a kidnapper
  • He had no mercy for the people he attacked.
  • He was jailed, he escaped from Jail and still killed again.
  • If granted parole in years later, someone like him would still atatck innocents again.
  • It was the good that the society got rid of him. People like him would always be a danger to other good people.
  • The people that he killed did not deserve to die also. He was only made to tast his own medicine.

Read more on the death penalty here: brainly.com/question/509558

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, it is a felony for an auditor to willfully fail to maintain proper records of audits and w
    8·1 answer
  • Based on our studies and understanding of the constitution as well as the principles from which it was founded on, Do you believ
    10·1 answer
  • The Supreme Court allowed United Parcel Service employees to open packages without a warrant to inspect contents of the package
    12·1 answer
  • Explain the difference between the rate law for a reaction and the integrated rate law for a reaction. What relationship does ea
    12·1 answer
  • A government agency has been given authority to oversee business activity in
    11·1 answer
  • Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
    8·2 answers
  • Which one of the following statements regarding the right to freedom of association is correct?
    12·1 answer
  • I Need Help this is my Exam
    8·2 answers
  • which supreme court case determined that the death penalty could not be used on people with mental disabilities?
    12·1 answer
  • Who on this app is turning 14 in 2022
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!