1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lukranit [14]
3 years ago
10

Favre, Ch. 9 (Access to the Court – Standing and Legal Injury)

Law
1 answer:
HACTEHA [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Check below for the answers and explanations

Explanation:

1) Standing is the process of examining the right of a plaintiff to take a lawsuit to the court of law.

Standing is important to ensure that the case brought to court is actually a dispute and not a contempt from an aggrieved party. It also ensures that the innocent is not unlawfully punished.

2) Sierra Club could have had a standing to file the lawsuit if it had an evidence or a likelihood of being injured or harmed

3) The Sierra club case led to the birth of a dissent that environmental objects should be regarded as persons in ecological matters.

4)The case did not have standing because it was filed by an organization and this conflicts with the Animal Welfare Act which stated that individuals and organizations do not have standing to file a lawsuit in a court.

5) Mr Jurnove, a worker of the Animal Legal Defence Fund was able to provide a substantial claim of the injuries he suffered when he saw the ill treatment the animals were subjected to by USDA.

Though other plaintiffs do not have standing, as far as one of them does, it will not be considered whether or not the others have standing. Therefore, the plaintiff had standing.

6) None of the plaintiffs that were acting on behalf of the dolphin met the requirement of "Injury in fact", a necessary requirement to have standing. None of them could give evidences of the injuries suffered as a result of the act by The New England Aquarium.

You might be interested in
***50 POINTS+BRAINLEST***
dimaraw [331]

Answer: violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection clause

Explanation:

Plessy claimed the law violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection clause, which requires that a state must not “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” The Supreme Court disagreed with Plessy's argument and instead upheld the Louisiana law.

7 0
2 years ago
Define the principle of the justice system
xenn [34]
The principal of justice could be described as the moral obligation to act on the basis of fair adjudication between competing claims. As such, it is linked to fairness, entitlement and equality.
3 0
3 years ago
How many senators does each state have in congress
dexar [7]

Answer:

2

Explanation: Each state has two congress members to have a equal amount of representation from each state.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What drug has an increased risk of over dose when taken with alcohol
Katyanochek1 [597]

Answer: opioids

Explanation:

opioid painkillers, Heroin, Vicodin, Fentanyl, Percocet, depressants

6 0
2 years ago
This is a prejudice that is leaning toward a positive or negative judgment on something; a personal judgment or opinion about a
geniusboy [140]

Answer:

Bias

Explanation:

The correct term for this idea is "bias." A bias is a prejudice that encourages a person to pass a judgement on something, whether this is positive or negative. However, this judgement is reached without enough information to truly make an informed decision. Therefore, bias is an undesirable thing to have. Moreover, biases can be particularly negative for certain people whose objectivity is particularly important. This is the case with professionals such as politicians, psychologists and journalists.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A copyright holder can BLANK for copyright violations
    8·1 answer
  • The main types of trade barriers are:
    13·1 answer
  • If you arrive at a 4 way stop intersection at the same time as another user on yur right
    5·1 answer
  • Please help me by answering !
    9·1 answer
  • In the case, Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court broaden the protection against
    14·1 answer
  • 100 point give away <br> have a good day/night wherever you are
    13·2 answers
  • Qué significa ser representativo? y explicar-interpretar el articulo 22 de la C.N Argentina
    15·1 answer
  • A particular issue with refugee families is that
    11·1 answer
  • Citizenship as a right that is materialised through active participation
    14·1 answer
  • Explain what the power to regulate interstate commerce means?.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!