The statement is true as the court reversed itself as the New Jersey court did regarding automobile search being the right decision to prevent crimes.
Stare decisis is Latin for "to hold fast to what has been decided." If a prior court has made a ruling on the same or a closely comparable matter when a court is faced with a legal argument, the court will follow that precedent when making its conclusion.
On September 24, the New Jersey Supreme Court upheld a decision that allowed police to search cars without first obtaining a warrant. No state rule or subjectivity is present in this situation, negating the need for such state-specific judgments. The court made the correct judgment to go in the opposite direction as the New Jersey court did with regard to car searches.
However, as in-state v. Witt, a new jersey supreme court case discussed in class, where a court will reverse itself as the new jersey court did regarding automobile searches stands TRUE.
To know more about the rule of stare decisis, refer to this link:
brainly.com/question/4997437
#SPJ4
The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution protects persons and their property from unreasonable searches by the government. In the Kyllo's case, the police obtained evidence of a marijuana growing operation inside Kyllo’s home, by using a thermal imaging device from outside the home. The police used the device to gather evidence to support issuance of a search warrant for the home.
In this case, I as the detective will use thermal imaging to get some details about the stolen items from outside Jasper's house. The evidence provided by this thermal imaging will provide me enough evidence to obtain a search warrant into Jasper's house. Based on the fourth amendment of the constitution, the detective cannot get a search warrant into the defendant's home unless they have provided a convincing evidence that an illegal item is contained in the defendant's house.
Answer:
Your filing status determines the income levels for your Federal tax bracket. It is also important for calculating your standard deduction, personal exemptions.
Explanation:
I hope this helped
Answer:
A perusal of the rule requires the consent of the biological parent for the adoption of the child. Hence, if we will just apply the above-mentioned law, the consent of the child's biological father would be indispensable.
Yea lots of ppl just guess and it’s not very accurate
