They had to have a vote of 9/13 meaning 9 out of the 13 states had to agree.
During a criminal trial where Emerly was found guilty, evidence was presented against her which Emerly and her lawyer feel was unfairly prejudicial. ... If an appeals court finds that the evidence against Emerly should have been excluded, she can receive a new trial.
Hope this helps
Answer: Transportation Security Administration
Explanation:
Answer:
It is slightly a common thing, not completely.
<em>I hope this helped at all.</em>