Why not ask what a persons options were before you judge their actions ?
Where things are i would check a text book i i were you
Answer:
If there is no more public participation, many shops will not be open for weeks but even months as nobody is going to buy anything or
Explanation:
As nobody even wants to participate in public participation of process
Answer:
3.The defense lawyer concluded his remarks with a foolproof argument of the defendant's innocence.
Explanation:
Sentence number 3 is the one that uses the word foolproof as described by the second definition because it is stating that there is not any possibility to fail with this argument. In other words, it is saying that with that argument, the layer is going to win the case.
The other options use the term foolproof as something that is designed to function despite the human error, they all refer to an object or activity that involves human beings, and that did or did not work despite human error
Answer: I would say “In the deepening twilight three figures were walking across the lawn toward the window.”
Explanation: It is suspenseful because the main character thinks they are ghosts, however, it is humerus in that this is merely a prank.
(Love this story BTW)
