In the summer of 1942, the town of Molching was preparing for the inevitable."
The inevitable would mean being targeted for becoming a part of the war. The people were preparing for attack
<span>Use of terror as a political tool
Cult of personality surrounding the leader
Large degree of centralised political control - often relying on the leader to dictate or mediate between local political leaders.
However, the differences are vast.
Stalinism is an economic and political system.
Under Stalin the means of production, factories, farms, shops and banks, are owned by the state, or by worker co-operatives.
Workers are paid, "from each according to their ability, to each according to their need", so workers are not paid the same, but according to their skills and their needs.
Politically, Stalinism was very authoritarian,curtailing free speech and all other political parties - with extra-legal means (violence, disappearances and murders) being used against political enemies, real and imagined.
Importantly Stalinism was not a racist ideology, believing that workers of all countries share a common culture and will "inevitably" one day unite, ridding themselves of their oppressors - the middle class factory owners and their political allies.
Communism is an economic and political system. Under most variants the means of production, factories, farms, shops and banks, are owned by the state, or by worker co-operatives. Workers are paid, "from each according to their ability, to each according to their need", so workers are not paid the same, but according to their skills and their needs. Politically communism tends to be authoritarian, banning other political parties - although communist parties operate successfully in many countries within democratic frameworks (look at Italy, France, and India - especially Kerela and Bengal). It is not a racist ideology, believing that workers of all countries share a common culture and will "inevitably" one day unite, ridding themselves of their oppressors - the middle class factory owners and their political allies.
Communism and National Socialism share very few similarities, anyone who says that they are the same thing knows little about either.
National Socialism is a political system based on ideas of racial superiority. Racism is central to Nazism, a core belief, other main features are:
Corporatism - co-opting employers and workers into the state
Leader principle, cult of personality based on a charismatic leader
Authority of leader supersedes the usual mechanisms of state
Anti-communism & anti-liberalism
Aggressive militarism - 'war is the only hygiene' (Marinetti)
Extreme nationalism
Idea that their methods represent a 'higher' form of organisation than democracy, socialism or any other form of government.
Use of violence & threats to impose their views on society.
A reaction against the perceived 'ills' of the modern world.
A belief in the 'volk' or people as having some kind of innate mission that sets them apart from other countries.
The Nazis were socialist in name only, to persuade workers to join them, not because they believed in free healthcare or a more fair allocation of resources; the Nazis were capitalists.
Because racism is a central idea of Nazism it is not possible to be a non-racist Nazi - that would be more akin to Fascism, which is militantly nationalistic, but not necessarily racist.
Fascism is very similar to Nazism, but without the racist element to its ideology.
Lol at all those who claim Obama, or Republicans - stay in school, you might learn something.
Death is not a shared characteristic. There have been communist regimes that haven't slaughtered their political opponents - such as the democratically elected communist governments in Kerala, and West Bengal in India, in Nepal and the elected communist mayors of many French and Italian cities.</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
humans dominate nature orientation
Explanation:
Thses kinds of people with this mindset have a humans dominate nature orientation
Answer:
I. Viewing many television programs that associate successful males with football
III. Operant conditioning
IV. Gender schemata
Explanation:
As we can see in the question above, the boy contracted a very wrong custom of associating virility with his ability and taste for playing football. According to the boy, he is only manly and manly enough boys who like and know how to play football.
This thought (which is extremely wrong) occurs with the influence of some things. The first is the frequency with which this boy watches many television programs that show men, soccer players with a successful and well-established career.
The second influence is the result of operant conditioning, which is a psychological concept characterized by a form of learning that allows a person to associate a situation with a punishment. In this case, the boy associates the lack of skill and the lack of interest in football with words that cause embarrassment as punishment. For this reason, he calls his colleagues who don't like football "sissy".
The third influence occurs through gender schemes, which is a term used to describe the separation of things, activities and behavior as feminine and masculine, in addition to determining that only women can do what is considered feminine and only men can do what it's male. The boy associates football with masculinity and those who do not like or have no interest in football are feminine, effeminate and not men.
Answer:
Making a haiku longer would water it down as a poem. Haiku are especially effective because words are used sparingly. Also, you read a haiku over a couple of times because you realize there’s more to the poem than you noticed at first.
Explanation:
sorry im a bit late
