1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
11111nata11111 [884]
3 years ago
15

Can someone put this into dumb people words please. The central theme of the book is the historical necessity of revolution, and

the impossibility of preventing it. Even the forces of reaction produce revolution by making the revolution more conscious of itself, as the reactionaries resort to ever more brutal methods to suppress the inevitable.
History
1 answer:
Marizza181 [45]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

the purpose of this book is to tell you why revolution is necessary and why it’s impossible to prevent it. even the forces of reactions (like how people react to it) only makes matters worse by trying to stop revolution from happening.

Explanation: best i could do lol

You might be interested in
at the end of the 1800s, why did people fear china might be split into different imperialist colonies
lutik1710 [3]
China was to weak to defend
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What requirements did settlers have to meet to keep their claims? check all of the boxes that apply. settlers had to promise to
Vladimir [108]
According the the Homestead Act of 1862, the only two valid answers are A. Settlers had to promise to avoid contact with American Indian tribal lands and D. Settlers had to improve the land (e.g., by buying a house) to keep it.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did jefferson describe blacks
allsm [11]

He described it as a cruelty and that it was bad but at the same time he owned about 600 slaves and only freed 7 in his whole life so it’s really complex

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the 1939 cash-and-carry amendment to the Neutrality Acts favor Britain over Germany?
Keith_Richards [23]

The correct answer would be: The 1939 cash-and-carry amendment to the Neutrality Acts favored Britain over Germany because "Britain had a larger fleet of ships to carry arms than Germany".


With this amendment, lobbied by Roosevelt, the U.S. was allowed to trade arms with belligerent countries in Europe. The only condition was that the recipients provided transport and paid immediately in cash. <u>Great Britain</u> and France had absolute control of the seas, so the amendment put them at a massive advantage over Germany by being able to transport weaponery safely and freely.



Hope this helps!

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes the reception of the former slave Olaudah Equiano's memoir in America?
labwork [276]

The statement that describes the reception of the former slave Olaudah Equines memoir would be that the book was banned, it sold poorly up until the outbreak of the civil war. In which then the book was a huge success and contributed to the American Abolition movement. But even with the success rates, Southern colonial governors were able to cease the publication after the second edition of it. 

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does strategy mean ?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes how the idea of Manifest Destiny
    7·1 answer
  • General Lee was devoted to the Union, however, when Virginia left the Union
    10·1 answer
  • Let's say that in 1879 an owner drove 1,000 head of cattle from south Texas to market in Dodge City but lost 100 cattle to stamp
    7·1 answer
  • What rights did women lack in the early 1800s?
    6·1 answer
  • Executive Branch Scenarios:
    14·1 answer
  • Identify the faction that emphasized agriculture. *
    12·1 answer
  • Compare and Contrast the efforts of Martin
    15·1 answer
  • How big is the sun?
    12·1 answer
  • Would Karl Marx have agreed with the statement, "Religion
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!