Answer:
The reader can most likely infer that Washington
held as binding and sacred the constitutional liberty of the nation.
Explanation:
What can the reader most likely infer from the fact that the author referred to George Washington as “the Union’s “great political cement’ in the passage? The reader can most likely infer that Washington is the only president who successfully held the Union together.
The question is whether the monkey’s paw actually has actual magical powers or are the events taking place in the story purely coincidental.
<u>Explanation
:</u>
‘The Monkey’s Paw’ written by W.W. Jacobs in 1902 is a suspenseful and supernatural tale of the mystifying powers. Sergeant Morris in the story, who brings along with him the paw when he comes to dine with the Whites, says that the things happen so naturally when the magical paw is put to use that one may attribute them to coincidence.
The events that take place in the life of Mr. and Mrs. White and their son Herbert after Mr. White makes a wish seem to be a coincidence. Nothing can prove them to be a result of the supernatural powers of the Monkey’s Paw.
This questions remains unanswered and just like the whites never knew whether the powers existed or not, they just made wishes, the reader also has no evidence to assert this with confidence. Neither is it said so by the narrator.
This helps make connections as the reader stays involved and tries to and does comprehend well. What the author seems to state is fate governs humans.
The protest document is urging readers to assert their opposition to the draft.
It views conscription (forced enrollment in the military) as a transgression of the citizens' rights protected by the Constitution. That is why the document asks people to resist the draft ("Do not submit to intimidation") because if they consent, they are also part of the problem. Submitting and being silent about their rights would mean that they are encouraging freedom violation: "If you do not assert and support your rights, you are helping to deny or disparage rights."
The right to bear arms does not belong to the 6th amendment, it belongs to the 2nd
Answer Avail because it's always used in a conjunction with another word with enhancing the second word initial meaning