This question not incomplete
Complete Question
The life of a semiconductor laser at a constant power is normally distributed with a mean of 7,000 hours and a standard deviation of 600 hours. If three lasers are used in a product and they are assumed to fail independently, the probability that all three are still operating after 7,000 hours is closest to? Assuming percentile = 95%
Answer:
0.125
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming for 95%
z score for 95th percentile = 1.645
We find the Probability using z table.
P(z = 1.645) = P( x ≤ 7000)
= P(x<Z) = 0.95
After 7000 hours = P > 7000
= 1 - P(x < 7000)
= 1 - 0.95
= 0.05
If three lasers are used in a product and they are assumed to fail independently, the probability that all three are still operating after 7,000 hours is calculated as:
(P > 7000)³
(0.05)³ = 0.125
Answer:
1/48
Step-by-step explanation:
1/4 of the cookies were Kim's
1/3 of that ( 1/3 x 1/4) were chocolate chips which is 1/12 of the total
1/4 of that ( 1/12 x 1/4) had nuts . which is 1/48 of the total
The fraction is 1/48
If my answer is incorrect, pls correct me!
If you like my answer and explanation, mark me as brainliest!
-Chetan K
for question 1
Area of Base B =45×25 = 1125 cm²
perimeter of base P = 2(45+25) = 140 cm
Height = 15 cm
Using the formula
Surface area = 2B + Ph
A = 2×1125 + 140×15= 4350 cm²
Voume = Bh = 1125×15= 16875 cm³
For question 2,
Area of base = 7× 5/2= 17.5 cm²
Perimeter of base = (7+7+7) = 21 cm
Surface area = 2B + Ph
Surface area of prism = 2×17.5+ 21×10 = 245cm²
Volume = Bh = 17.5×10 = 175 cm³
Answer:
Segunda etapa= 123.75 metros
Step-by-step explanation:
Altura total= 225 metros
<u>En la primera estapa subió el 20% (un quinto):</u>
Primera etapa= 225*0.2= 45 metros
<u>En la tercera etapa subió 25% (un cuarto):</u>
Tercera etapa= 225*0.250 56.25 metros
Ahora debemos determinar cuánto subió en la segunda etapa:
Segunda etapa= altura total - total subido
Segunda etapa= 225 - (45 + 56.25)
Segunda etapa= 123.75 metros
<span>
Let's analyze Hannah's work, step-by-step, to see if she made any mistakes. </span>In Step 1, Hannah wrote

<span> as the sum of two separate derivatives </span>

<span>using the </span><span>sum rule.
</span>
This step is perfectly fine. In Step 2,

was kept as it is, and

was rewritten as

using the constant rule.Indeed, according to the constant rule, the derivative of a constant number is equal to zero.
This step is perfectly fine. In Step 3,

was rewritten as

supposedly using the constant multiple rule.
The problem is that according to the constant multiple rule,

should be rewritten as

and not as

.
<span>
Therefore, Hannah made a mistake in this step.</span>