1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Agata [3.3K]
2 years ago
14

What could happen if people do not fulfill a civic duty or responsibility? Give a specific example.

History
2 answers:
zlopas [31]2 years ago
5 0

A lot of bad things can happen. One reason is that if they don't fulfill their civic duty, we wouldn't be having elections and their would not be any leaders. This is especially bad because the U.S. is famous for it's leaders and it's freedom. I myself is a immigrant and is very fond of this country. That is one reason of many more.


hichkok12 [17]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

If people did not fulfill a civic responsibility, the world would be a mess. An example is picking up trash. Picking up trash is not an obligation, but people do it because it’s their responsibility. If nobody picked up trash, the world would be a literal mess. There would be trash all over the ground and water. Lots of animals would die because they might eat trash their not supposed to eat or they might get stuck in trash. If people did not fulfill their civic obligations/duties, then they might be fined, spend time in jail, and there are other punishments too. (I could think of an example but this already seemed kind of long so I didn’t write it.)

You might be interested in
How is the free soil party different from the know nothing party?
umka21 [38]

Answer:

The Know-Nothing Party was established in 1850.

In July of 1844, riots broke out in the city of Philadelphia. Nativists battled Irish immigrants which resulted up to two Catholic churches and a Catholic school being burned down.

The Know-Nothing Party was was an outgrowth of the strong anti-immigrant people.

In 1843, The Know-Nothings formed the American Republic Party.

1854 they had allied themselves with groups within another political party called the Whigs.

In 1855, The Know-Nothings dropped much of their secrecy and became known as the American Party.

FREE-SOILER PARTY

The Free-Soiler Party was a short political party in the US during 1848-1852 presidential elections

It was the 3rd largest party that grew it's greatest strength from New York.

The party leadership consisted of former anti-slavery members of the Whig Party and the Democratic Party.

Its main purpose was opposing the expansion of slavery into the western territories, arguing that free men on free soil comprised a morally and economically superior system to slavery.

Its presidential nominee in 1848, Martin Van Buren, received 291,616 votes against Zachary Taylor of the Whigs and Lewis Cass of the Democrats, but Van Buren received no electoral votes. The Party's "spoiler" effect in 1848 may have put Zachary Taylor into office in a narrowly-contested election.

The Compromise of 1850 temporarily neutralized the issue of slavery and undercut the party's no-compromise position. Most Barnburners returned to the Democratic party, and the Free Soil Party became dominated by ardent anti-slavery leaders.

The Free Soil Party was a notable third party. More successful than most, it sent two Senators and fourteen Representatives to the thirty-first Congress, which convened from March 4, 1849 to March 3, 1851.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following best describes an effect of the establishment of the Mongol Empire upon Silk Road long distance trade?
katrin [286]

Answer:

is widely accepted that the rise of the Mongol Empire greatly expanded trade and …

A) The Silk Road trade declined because the Mongol merchants preferred to use …

B) The Silk Road trade increased because the Mongol conquests helped connect …

✓ B) The Silk Road trade increased because the Mongol conquest

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Are amercans denied their liberty in any sense today?
topjm [15]
In a way kinda yes. it all depends on how you look at it.


6 0
2 years ago
In 1966, the supreme court ruled in miranda v. arizona that: question 2 options: suspects could not refuse to cooperate with pol
marissa [1.9K]
The supreme court ruled that the suspects can refuse to cooperate and the police has the duty of informing suspects what their rights are and how their rights are applied. Suspects can remain silent and not incriminate themselves which means not cooperating with the police.
5 0
2 years ago
How was life similar and or different from American before during and after the war did the war change the role of women in Amer
Elodia [21]

they had to be alert for troops

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How were mexicans treated in segregation?
    10·2 answers
  • What role did jackie robinson play in the civil rights movement?
    11·1 answer
  • Why was the Articles of Confederation discarded?
    5·1 answer
  • The bill of the rights is intended to protect individuals freedoms and the
    13·1 answer
  • which of the following caliphates have been credited with preserving the achievements of the ancient Greeks during the Middle Ag
    12·1 answer
  • A.
    7·1 answer
  • Can y'all tell me 5 African American writers, speakers, and poets from the civil rights movement?
    12·1 answer
  • How did knowledge of the shipbuilding and navigation affect North America?
    9·1 answer
  • Please help!!! I think it’s C but I need confirmation
    11·1 answer
  • What made Germany’s invasions of Europe difficult to stop during World War II?<br><br> .
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!