Answer:
centralized state
Explanation:
Also known as the 'First Emperor of Qin', Qin Shihuang who ruled between 221 to 206 BC engaged in the military conquests of many surrounding states. He finished the Great Wall of China and constructed the terracotta army. In his time, the currency of China, its writing, and measurements were standardized in order to have a unified and centralized state.
After this unity was achieved, they could then engage in military conquests and construction projects, unitedly. In his time, all men were made to serve in the military for at least a year. Shihuang commanded respect from everyone, and failure to submit to him resulted in death.
I'm not sure if the emphasis is to be put on the fact that the <em>Pope</em> declared or that the event occurred. I'll answer both.
It was significant that the Pope declared it because he was pretty much the only person who had the ability to declare such a thing. Even though the kingdoms of Europe had different rulers, most kingdoms were based on the Catholic religion. Therefore, the Pope had influence. If he declared something, it was as good as God declaring it.
It was significant that a Holy Roman Emperor was declared because it was the first step -- of many -- to achieving German unification. Before Charlemagne, Germany was nothing more than the Germanic tribes. The Holy Roman Empire, which lasted until 1806, kept these kingdoms united.
The <span>United States implemented a policy to help Japan recover and rebuild after World War 2 since it was clear from World War I that trying to punish a country (like Japan of Germany) for starting a war was actually detrimental to future peace. </span>
Answer:Nobles aligned with either Catholics or Protestant traditions and went to war
So few cases against monopolies and trust, also called The Sherman Act, were won for the fed during the Gilded Age (1870-1900) because it was loosely formulated and failed to define such critical terms as "trust", "combination", "conspiracy" and "monopoly". Despite substantial fees and jail expeditions for those who decided to form such combinations, the Act was dismantled five years later. In other words, monopolies and trusts were encouraged by the federal courts.
