Answer:
natural and probable consequence
Explanation:
The <u>natural and probable consequence</u> doctrine provides that a person encouraging or facilitating the commission of a crime will be held liable as an accomplice for the crime he or she aided and abetted as well as for the crimes that are a likely and feasible outcome of the criminal conduct
.
The natural and probable consequence doctrine states that an individual who aided another in committing a crime is liable for the crime committed and also for other related crimes which resulted in the process of committing that crime. For example, if an individual aids another the crime of home invasion and in the process occupants of the house where assaulted, according to the natural and probable consequence doctrine, the abettor is guilty of home invasion, assault even though he/she was not physically involved in the assault.
Answer:
self serving bias
Explanation:
Self-serving bias as described by the social psychologist refers to the tendency of the people to give themselves the credit for the positive events and blame external factors for the negative actions. For example, a director gives himself the credit for the success of his movie but if it fails he blame actors for it.
Answer:
The systematic ways in which our ethics are limited is bounded ethicality.
Explanation:
Our ability to make ethical choices can be limited because of pressures that arise, both internal and external. First, there are organizational or social pressures that limit our abilities to make ethical choices. For example, the tendency that many have to conform to the actions of those around us often make it hard to act otherwise and to do what is right. We all have cognitive biases that can make it difficult to act ethically. Our internal biases can also make it hard to act in ways that are not self-serving because we tend to favor ourselves at the expense of others subconsciously.
It would be the department of the treasury.
Answer:
the book is blood by the river right?
Explanation:
