1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
True [87]
2 years ago
5

Which are accurate statements about the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003?

History
2 answers:
cluponka [151]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The correct answers are B and D. Regarding the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, some American officials believed Saddam Hussein was acquiring weapons of mass destruction. Other officials strongly disagreed. Also, President Bush refused to allow UN inspectors more time to check Iraqi facilities for weapons of mass destruction.

Explanation:

The War in Iraq was a conflict that began on Thursday, March 20, 2003 and ended on Sunday, December 18, 2011.

The main justification for this operation offered by the President of the United States, George W. Bush, and his allies in the coalition, was the affirmation that Iraq possessed and was developing weapons of mass destruction. US officials argued, in an interested and tendentious way, that Iraq represented an imminent, urgent and immediate threat to the United States, its people and its allies, as well as to its interests. Information services were widely criticized, and the inspectors appointed for that purpose found no evidence that the alleged weapons of mass destruction existed. After the invasion, the Iraq Research Group concluded that Iraq had completed its programs to develop such weapons in 1991 and there were none at the time of the invasion, but that they intended to resume production if the sanctions were lifted. Some US officials claimed that Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda had been cooperating, but there is no evidence of a collaborative relationship, and other reasons for the invasion by officials included concerns over Iraq's financial support for families of Palestinian terrorists, violations of human rights by the Iraqi government, the spread of democracy, or Iraq's oil reserves, although the latter has been denied by some officials.

zhuklara [117]2 years ago
3 0
B. Some U.S. officials believed Saddam Hussein was acquiring weapons of mass destruction. Other officials strongly disagreed.
You might be interested in
In his criticism of the Constitution, historian Charles Beard noted that property interests were ______.
soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer:

Often discussed during the Philiadelphia convention.

Explanation:

5 0
1 year ago
In ancient Chinese folklore, what is Chang'e flying to the moon?
AlladinOne [14]

Answer:

Chang'e flying to the moon is one of the ancient Chinese folklore. It tells the story of Chang'e, who stole an elixir and flew to the moon, and has since separated from her husband Yi Tiandi. The Mid-Autumn Festival, a traditional Chinese festival, comes from the folklore of Chang'e flying to the moon. Regarding the legend of Chang'e flying to the moon, there are various opinions in the folk. This story first appeared in the Western Han Dynasty document "Huainanzi".

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the significance of social Darwinism?​
Burka [1]

Answer:

It kept people in place and reminded them of there role in society.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which component of the Compromise of 1850 most enraged Northerners? A. the Kansas-Nebraska Act B. the acceptance of Missouri as
Reptile [31]

Answer:

The correct answer to the following question will be Option A (the Kansas Nebraska Act).

Explanation:

  • Throughout 1854, the legislature passed a resolution that separated the territory west including its provinces of Missouri as well as Iowa and indeed the Minnesota territory across 2 different territories, Nebraska as well as Kansas.
  • This would be a vital system of literature since it tackled a variety of contentious topics, including racism, western extension, as well as intercontinental railroads.

All those other alternatives are relevant to the situation in question. So, the solution above is the right one.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these is the MOST accurate example of de jure discrimination A) restaurants that serve ethnic food B) places of worship
vladimir1956 [14]

The correct answer is D) public schools designated for "whites only."

<em>The option that is an example of de jure discrimination is, public schools designated for "whites only."</em>

De jure segregation was a form of segregation for African Americans in the United States. This was race discrimination enforced by the law. Government laws in the Southern States allowed discrimination for black peole. For instance, laws that ordered public education, public schools only to be attended by white students. That is an example of de jure discrimination, a legal separation of groups based on race.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these was the most important outcome of the war with Mexico in the 1840's?
    7·1 answer
  • What is the relationship between Pangaea and today’s continents
    14·2 answers
  • Read the passage. Last summer was the hottest on record, according to state weather statistics. Reports indicate rainfall levels
    6·2 answers
  • What is one requirement for applying to become an American citizen?
    7·2 answers
  • Which group of statements best describes the savanna?
    10·1 answer
  • When did these traders arrive in the area and why?
    6·1 answer
  • Explain why slaves were needed in the southern states but not needed in the northern states.
    9·1 answer
  • In the Byzantine Empire, who had the final say on church matters?
    7·2 answers
  • Identify the factors (new resources, increased productivity, education, technology, slave economy, territorial expansion) that i
    14·2 answers
  • Why is it irrational and unproductive to try to "prove" or "disprove" the<br> existence of God?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!