Answer:
(1857) Dred Scott v. Sandford
Explanation: In the opinion of the court, the legislation and histories of the times, and the language used in the Declaration of Independence, show, that neither the class of persons who had been imported as slaves, nor their descendants, whether they had become free or not, were then acknowledged as a part of the people, nor
I hope this answers your question! :D
I’m almost certain the answer is
“Thomas E. Watson”
Answer:
Manifest Destiny, an express coined in 1845, is the thought that the Joined together States is destined—by God, its advocates believed—to extend its domain and spread popular government and capitalism over the whole North American landmass. The reasoning drove 19th-century U.S. regional development and was utilized to legitimize the constrained expulsion of Local Americans and other bunches from their homes. The quick extension of the Joined together States escalates the issue of subjugation as unused states were included to the Union, driving to the flare-up of the Civil War.The fundamental cause of the war was the affirmation of Texas into the United States of America. Since Mexico did not recognize Texas's independence after its useful rebellion against the Mexican government it was seen as an intrusion into the Mexican region once Texas acknowledged the welcome into the United States.
I hope this helps.
D.) Almost doubled the area of the U.S. and gave it control of the Mississippi River.
