No because they’ll just murder everyone because they feel a little offended over anything
Answer:
Answer down below v
Explanation:
Well I know that global unity is uniting people of different origins, cultures, and languages, to make the world be a more peaceful and loving place.
We can accomplish this by doing just littles things. Like greeting new people who might not be from around here. Just over all being nice to one another, despite what they look like or what they believe. Learning to understand each other. Even if this means they might be different from you. Learning that everyone in the world is equal and should be treated the same.
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
Yes. Since both Hinduism, as well as Buddhism, are Dharmic religions, they usually accept each other's practices and many people practice a combination of both. In 2015, a new constitution was adopted and granted equal rights to all religions in Nepal.
Hopefully this helped.