7. F - The Constitution was not a warship. The USS Constitution was a ship but was a training ship.
8. F - The British were forced to abandon Detroit due to their amount of casualties.
9. F - William Henry Harrison led an army against the British and didn't capture Canada.
In order to answer this, you must have a clear understanding of the difference between a primary source and a secondary source. A primary source is one that has been written in the time period being studied. A secondary source analyzes key points, often based off of primary sources.
Knowing these definitions, we can conclude that the correct answer is (c)<span> an academic analysis of key battlefield strategies. An academic analysis will provide insight on the topic being studied (in this case battlefield strategies), however it is typically not written with a direct connection to the time.</span>
Answer:
D. democratization of the political system.
Explanation:
By 1988, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev expanded his reforms to include the "democratization of the political system."
Mikhail Gorbachev was known as the Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union. During his time, he made so many reforms that show democratic principles and political systems, such as allowing multi-party elections to hold during this period.
He also allowed the unification of Germany through democratic principles.
We have to remember that there was a big difference between the treaties themselves and the paper documents that European-Americans used to record those treaties. For many Native Americans, a treaty was an oral agreement between governments. It was methodically memorized and often sealed with an exchange of gifts. In the eastern part of North America, wampum belts (which were shells strung together to create images) served as official records of these treaties, and were draped over a speaker's body when the treaty was being recited later on, much as Europeans might read aloud the text of a written agreement between two European countries.
For Natives, the oral agreement, along with these wampum belts, WERE the treaty, and the paper document they signed was just some odd European habit that they often simply tolerated. Many of the Native leaders who signed these treaties could not read what they were signing, and even if they could they did not recognize the documents as being the official record of what was agreed on.
