1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Blababa [14]
3 years ago
13

As de-extinction is no longer a fantasy of science is it really such a good idea?reaction paper​

Geography
1 answer:
ivanzaharov [21]3 years ago
3 0

In general, de-extinction is not really a good idea.

Explanation:

De-extinction is a process through which organisms that lived in the past, but now are extinct, are resurrected, thus brought back into the environment. While this has only been a fantasy in the past, with the development of the technology it has actually become a real possibility. The opinions are divided about the de-extinction though, with lot of scientists and people supporting it, but as many also objecting it. The fact is that it is an unfamiliar zone, and it will be a big experiment if wild organisms are revived and set free, and it can go either way.

  • The re-creation of an extinct species at letting it into the wild can bring many risks, be it direct danger, harming the environment, or it will just simply not be able to survive as the ecosystem is not the same as in the time when it lived.
  • There can be big consequences by disturbing the natural food chains, thus causing some existing species to go extinct at the expense of the re-created species.
  • Another major problem is that there is no guarantee about the behavior of the re-created species, as they can indeed behave as they are supposed to, but they can also have much more different behavior.

Learn more about extinction brainly.com/question/3344534

#learnwithBrainly

You might be interested in
According to the graph above, the population gap between the United States and Japan is __________. A. widening B. shrinking C.
Rudiy27
The correct answer is - A. widening.

Both of the countries suffer from low fertility rate, Japan little more than the USA. The gap is widening because of the migrations.
- USA is country that is on the top of the list as a destination for migration, and also it is a country that allows big number of migrants in it every year, that contributes to the country's population to become bigger and bigger even though the fertility rate is low.
-Japan the other hand is a country that has both very low fertility rate, and very small amount of migrants coming to live in it, so the number of the population is stagnant for some time now, and is expected to start decreasing quickly in the coming years once the older population is not among the living anymore.
6 0
3 years ago
Name two plates that are made up of mainly oceanic crust
xenn [34]

Two plates that are made up mostly of oceanic crust are the Pacific plate and the Nazca plate.

Explanation:

There are numerous tectonic plates that divide the surface of Earth, and they can be divided into oceanic plates and continental plates. Another division commonly used is major plates. minor plates, and micro plates. The oceanic plates are plates that are mostly made up of oceanic crust, and the land masses on them are consisted of island arcs, mostly of volcanic origin. Some of the oceanic plates are:

  • Pacific plate
  • Nazca plate
  • Cocos plate
  • Caribbean plate
  • Scotia plate

The Pacific plate is the largest oceanic plate, and it is a major plate. It is dominated by ocean, with numerous island chains scattered across it. This plate is shrinking from all sides as it has subduction zones with all of the continental plates that surround it. The Nazca plate is another oceanic plate, being located between the South American and Pacific plates. It is a minor plate, and it has a subduction zone with the South American plate, which has resulted in the formation of the Andean Mountain Range.

Learn more about what is a subduction zone brainly.com/question/1358208

#learnwithBrainly

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following describes the relationship between elements of an ecosystem?
satela [25.4K]
The answer you are looking for is "<span>a. elements of ecosystems are mutually dependent on each other ".</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
To gain acceptance for the Constitution, the Federalists promised __________.
andrew11 [14]

Answer:

to enact a bill of rightsExplanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the significance of the Himalayan Mountains for the Indian Subcontinent?
Bezzdna [24]

Answer:

I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option A. The significance of the Himalayan Mountains for the Indian Subcontinent would be that they separate the Indian Subcontinent from Asia. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day. And can I get Brainliest?

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the primary mission of the twin rovers and the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL)?
    6·1 answer
  • The main process that links water in the atmosphere with water on the earth's surface is ________.
    5·1 answer
  • Do you believe humans are responsible for global warming or do you believe this is part of a natural cycle of the earth, like pe
    12·1 answer
  • Although ozone in the stratosphere has been decreasing in recent years, ozone near Earth's surface is on the increase. The ozone
    13·1 answer
  • What is a light year
    11·2 answers
  • Explain Three factors that can prohibit a region with a great deal of arable land from producing adequate food supplies
    10·1 answer
  • The groups making claims to the region are?​
    11·1 answer
  • What is the most appropriate title for the map above?
    11·1 answer
  • (50 POINTS) Why can earthquakes result in death and destruction thousands of miles from the epicenter?
    7·2 answers
  • Explain the climatic condition of South America (long answer)
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!