Answer:
During the Progressive Era, political leaders instituted policies designed to empower average Americans and curtail the power of large business interests. In the course of US history, the pendulum has swung between increasing government regulation of big business and leaving it free to grow as it will. In your lifetime, what decisions has the government made about increasing or decreasing this type of regulation? What have been the effects of those decisions? Compare the issues and outcomes to those of the early twentieth century decisions to regulate big business in the Progressive Era. You might also consider whether the media serve a similar "muckraking" role in causing this pendulum to swing one way or another
Unethical corporate behavior would have no negative impact on a community if it were to lead to an economic decline is false.
<u>Explanation:</u>
An economic decline is in all manners a negative trait irrespective of what actions it has surfaced through. Unethical corporate behavior, in the first place, can be deemed to be a negative activity responsible for the loss and eventual decline of the market, leading it to an overall economic decline.
It is because of certain unethical corporate practices followed by only a few players that are a part of the market, the entire market suffers and pays the cost.
The answer to this question is 28%.
As a nation of immigrants, united States host the most diverse group of people in the world.
Over several years, the immigrants have become a crucial part of our society, but the number is predicted to come down due to development of technology that allow workers to do their job remotely.
C would be the best choice in my opinion. Hope this helps!
