What was not one of the successes of the Reconstruction era?

History

2 answers:

Bumek [7]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

African Americans achieved economic equality with whites in the south

Explanation:

Recreation was essential in that it reestablished the United States as a brought together country by 1877, the majority of the previous Confederate states had created a new constitution that elaborated the amendments as dedicated to the American government

However, Reconstruction bombed by most different measures: Radical enactment was thrown to other slaves who were oppressed by the whites and did not bother about the changes that were opening.

Kitty [74]3 years ago

3 0

A: because blacks, even though being free, were still treated like slaves and some were even put into sharecropping to ensure they stayed poor

You might be interested in

Factor this trinomial completely.

sergeinik [125]

A)-6x2+26x+20

-12+26x+20

14+20

Explanation:

A)-6x2=-12+26=+14

14+20

=34

but i dont understand the questions after the letters what are there for???are we supppse to work them out

4 0

2 years ago

When Bataan fell in April 1942, most US and Filipino soldiers who surrendered to the Japanese

Vikentia [17]

After the April 9, 1942, U.S. surrender of the Bataan Peninsula on the main Philippine island of Luzon to the Japanese during World War II (1939-45), the approximately 75,000 Filipino and American troops on Bataan were forced to make an arduous 65-mile march to prison camps.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What were the causes and consquences of the civil war ?

vekshin1

Answer:

A very important cause of the cause of the American Civil War was the election of Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln wanted to abolish slavery and the Southerners did not want to be ruled by an anti-slavery Northerner. ... The amount of deaths/casualties in the American Civil War is also a very important effect

6 0

3 years ago

How was the English east India company created

alina1380 [7]

Answer:

the queen of England granted exclusive right to east india company in 1600

6 0

2 years ago

Why were the french less likely than the british to use military force when dealing with the native peoples of north america?

prisoha [69]

I believe the answer is: <span>Compared to the British colonists, the French population was relatively low.

Due to amount of soldiers available at their command, the british colonists can afford to went into confrontation with the natives without compromising their national defense. The french did not possess the same luxury as the british empire had, which force them to choose non-confrontational approach.</span>

3 0

3 years ago